Support BMG PAC!
About BMG PAC
Make a secure credit card contribution using Google Checkout:
$
Or send a check to BMG PAC, PO Box 877, Medford, MA 02155.
View BMG PAC's latest disclosure report


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?



FREE COPY OF BOB'S BOOK Barack Obama for Beginners to every 50th Facebook Friend!
BMG on Facebook

About
About us
Rules of the road - please read!
Formatting and multimedia tips
Email us
RSS feed

BMG TRAFFIC REPORT
Blue Mass. Swag
Creative Commons License

Event Calendar
February 2010
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* 01 02 03 04 05 06
07 08 09 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 * * * * * *
<< (add event) >>

Active Users
Currently 29 user(s) logged on.

Search




Advanced Search


Blog Roll
Massachusetts Left
.08 Acres
Below Boston
Berkshires Blog
Blue News Tribune
Chimes at Midnight
Eisenthal Report
Granby 01033
Health Care for All
Left in Lowell
MA lefty blogs
Marry in Mass.
Mass Engagement
Massachusetts Liberal
Michael Forbes-Wilcox
My Dedham
Progressive Mass.
Quriltai on the Shore
Ryan's Take
Someday I Will
ShrewsBuried
Talking Stoneham
The Fray
Universal hub

Differently-Winged
John Daley
Mass. Pro-Life
No Looking Backwards
Peter Porcupine
Pundit Review
Red Mass Group
Scaling the Hill 2010

Mass. Media
David S. Bernstein
Cambridge politics
CommonWealth Unbound
Globe bloggers
Herald bloggers
Hub Blog
Jon Keller
MassBeacon
Media Nation (Dan Kennedy)
Open Media Boston
Adam Reilly
Toll Talk (Mary Connaughton)
Weekly Dig Blog

Legal
ACS Blog
Balkinization
Election law
How Appealing
SCOTUSblog
Volokh Conspiracy

General
Accountable Strategies
Billionaires for Bush
Blue Works Better
Crooks and Liars
Daily Howler
Daily Kos
Democracy Arsenal
Eschaton (Atrios)
Glenn Greenwald
Grist (environment blog)
Hullabaloo (Digby)
LiberalOasis
MyDD
Oliver Willis
Pandagon
Political Animal
Political Critic
Political Wire
Poor Man
Progressive Blog Digest
Real Climate
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Tapped
Talking Points Memo
Think Progress
Truth and Progress
Turn Maine Blue
Wonkette

www.BlueMassGroup.com

Closing Telecom Loopholes

by: HeartlandDem

Thu May 21, 2009 at 10:01:05 AM EDT


(In addition to the telecom loophole (finally!!), the Senate also seems to have made progress on municipalities joining the GIC for their health care needs.  This is from a summary released by the Senate President's office:

1. Secretary for Administration and Finance formulates an average cost GIC "benchmark" for cities and towns;
2. If a town's health insurance costs are under the GIC benchmark, no change in health insurance is required for that municipality;
3. If a town's health insurance costs are above the GIC benchmark, the municipality will either negotiate a new plan below benchmark or join the GIC;
4. If no agreement is reached, an arbiter has 60 days to issue a judgment by which unions are required to comply;
5. Town management can reject the judgment on a two-thirds vote but be penalized their local aid amount that would have been saved by joining GIC.

Thoughts? - promoted by David)


SENATE CLAIMS NEW POLES AND WIRES TAX ON TELECOM WILL GENERATE $26 MIL.

While the Lege is beating up on Governor Patrick, they did manage to take a long overdue step to act on one of his early proposals.  Thank you.

 

HeartlandDem :: Closing Telecom Loopholes
SENATE CLAIMS NEW POLES AND WIRES TAX ON TELECOM WILL GENERATE $26 MIL
One tax increase that cleared the Senate Tuesday night but which received little attention as it was overshadowed by larger increases and buried in a bigger amendment would eliminate a property tax exemption on poles and wires located on public property and rights of way.  The telecommunications industry has long resisted the lifting of the exemption.  A summary of the "municipal relief" amendment provided by Senate President Therese Murray's office estimates that change will generate $26 million in new municipal tax revenue.  The Senate tax package approved Tuesday would also impose a $26 million tax by extending the sales tax to satellite subscription services, which would "achieve parity between cable companies and satellite providers," according to a Senate summary of the legislation, which must be reconciled in talks with the House.
 
Tags: , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
This answers my only qualm about GIC (6.00 / 5)
2. If a town's health insurance costs are under the GIC benchmark, no change in health insurance is required for that municipality;

With that in place, it's a good idea.

Yr. Obedient Servant, Peter Porcupine, Republican


Ah (6.00 / 1)
If I understand the plan correctly, this what happens:  The governor picks a faceless bureaucrat to decide benefits statewide.  Said mandarin arbitrarily decides a cutoff...er, "formulates a benchmark average"...and all municipalities are forced to budget under it.  That way, we can safely remove this power from persons elected by workers and citizens, and locate it with the executive branch where it belongs.  

Maybe the next plan can give the governor's next pick the power to decide property tax averages.

~~~~
Believe it or not, I have even more to say...


I would prefer carrots and sticks (5.50 / 2)
I agree towns should be able to keep locally-determined systems if they want.  They just should lose some percentage of their local aid if they aren't at/below the GIC level.  The state shouldn't be subsidizing their excessive benefits.

[ Parent ]
A little like ... (6.00 / 1)
Isn't that dangerously close to the sentiment that if someone is on welfare, then there should be limits on the kind of car they can drive, or even prevent them from getting their nails done -- after all "the state shouldn't be paying for that woman's fancy nails!"

[ Parent ]
Sab - there'd have to be data to supprot the benchmark; but I agree, the potential for abuse is there... (6.00 / 1)


Yr. Obedient Servant, Peter Porcupine, Republican

[ Parent ]
Heh (0.00 / 0)
Progressives are tripping over themselves to give the Mass. executive branch power...let's see how smart that looks when there's a governor in there they don't like.

I wouldn't want Romney telling me how much I should pay into health care.

~~~~
Believe it or not, I have even more to say...


[ Parent ]
Sab - he kinda DID... (0.00 / 0)


Yr. Obedient Servant, Peter Porcupine, Republican

[ Parent ]
Tel pole question (6.00 / 1)
Is the new property tax revenue for cities and towns above or below 2.5?  In other words, will this result in more revenue, or the same amount of revenue now paid by more parties (thereby lowing the property tax oh so slightly for current tax payers)?

I think ... (0.00 / 0)
but am not sure ... that this will add property to the tax rolls that is currently exempt.  So it should mean more revenue.  Right?

[ Parent ]
Most likely (6.00 / 1)
the telecoms will be considered "new growth", and therefore the tax levy will be increased by that (and other growth) plus 2 & 1/2 % of prior levy.

[ Parent ]
My town just lowered its tax rate - I want newer, prettier poles...maybe cedar...Pergo... (0.00 / 0)


Yr. Obedient Servant, Peter Porcupine, Republican

[ Parent ]
Maybe they could just bury the dang things (6.00 / 2)
and you'd have improved service during storms and a prettier neighborhood...

[ Parent ]
Why a "benchmark" (0.00 / 0)
Why not just, "the cost", as in

Secretary for Administration and Finance formulates an average cost GIC "benchmark" will ask the GIC to quote on the cost for cities and towns to join the GIC;
 

That makes sense (0.00 / 0)
although using the average may be a quick and inexpensive process.

[ Parent ]
Joe - I'd rather Median. God knows what Boston's health plan costs. (0.00 / 0)


Yr. Obedient Servant, Peter Porcupine, Republican

[ Parent ]
So, 6 million people in MA (0.00 / 0)
$26 million for the poles... we're looking at a little more than $4/person.

Of course, it's not quite so simple.  Boston will get far less because of density and underground wiring.  Rural areas have very low property values.  Low density sprawl may well get the most.

A very rough estimate on how much your town will get: population times $4.  Of course, that's not one time -- that's every year.  The timing is quite good for my community; we're short a few million on our budget and these few hundred thou will help a bit.


Double standard (0.00 / 0)
Municipalities should have the same management rights as the state.  

4. If no agreement is reached, an arbiter has 60 days to issue a judgment by which unions are required to comply;
 This is simply adding another layer of bureaucratic BS and designed to punish one party or the other.  


5. Town management can reject the judgment on a two-thirds vote but be penalized their local aid amount that would have been saved by joining GIC.
 This is simply another whack at local government.  It would likely be moot if local government were able to operate with the same standard as state government.

Local government/municipalities should have the same management rights and privileges as the state.  The state is not constantly in health insurance negotiations with unions and employees (bless their lucky hearts).  It offers the GIC (period).  The double standard is what needs to change.  


Pole tax is another end-run around Prop 2-1/2 (0.00 / 0)
Which is probably fine.

It's not like the $26 million is going to come out of the telecoms' pockets. They are going to pass it along to customers. So, it's another dollar out of the pocket of residents into the public fisc.

If we want to take more money from the citizenry, let's do it openly and progressively.





I support WWF


Political insider ad network Law blog ad network
Advertise Liberally









Powered by: SoapBlox