State Senate races
We've got two special elections for open Senate seats going on right now. Key dates:

Primary: April 13
General: May 11

Candidates:

Norfolk, Bristol & Middlesex (Brown's seat)
Lida Harkins (D)
Peter Smulowitz (D)
Richard Ross (R)

Middlesex, Suffolk & Essex (Galluccio's seat)
Michael Albano (D)
Dennis Benzan (D)
Sal DiDomenico (D)
Tim Flaherty (D)
Dan Hill (D)
Denise Simmons (D)



Support BMG PAC!
About BMG PAC
Make a secure credit card contribution using Google Checkout:
$
Or send a check to BMG PAC, PO Box 877, Medford, MA 02155.
View BMG PAC's latest disclosure report


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?



FREE COPY OF BOB'S BOOK Barack Obama for Beginners to every 100th Facebook Friend!

BMG on Facebook

About
About us
Rules of the road - please read!
Formatting and multimedia tips
Email us
RSS feed

BMG TRAFFIC REPORT
Blue Mass. Swag
Creative Commons License

Event Calendar
March 2010
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* 01 02 03 04 05 06
07 08 09 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31 * * *
<< (add event) >>

Active Users
Currently 26 user(s) logged on.

Search




Advanced Search


Blog Roll
Massachusetts Left
.08 Acres
Below Boston
Berkshires Blog
Blue News Tribune
Chimes at Midnight
Eisenthal Report
Granby 01033
Health Care for All
Left in Lowell
MA lefty blogs
Marry in Mass.
Mass Engagement
Massachusetts Liberal
Michael Forbes-Wilcox
My Dedham
Progressive Mass.
Quriltai on the Shore
Ryan's Take
Someday I Will
ShrewsBuried
Talking Stoneham
The Fray
Universal hub

Differently-Winged
John Daley
Mass. Pro-Life
No Looking Backwards
Peter Porcupine
Pundit Review
Red Mass Group
Scaling the Hill 2010

Mass. Media
David S. Bernstein
Cambridge politics
CommonWealth Unbound
Globe bloggers
Herald bloggers
Hub Blog
Jon Keller
MassBeacon
Media Nation (Dan Kennedy)
Open Media Boston
Adam Reilly
Toll Talk (Mary Connaughton)
Weekly Dig Blog

Legal
ACS Blog
Balkinization
Election law
How Appealing
SCOTUSblog
Volokh Conspiracy

General
Accountable Strategies
Billionaires for Bush
Blue Works Better
Crooks and Liars
Daily Howler
Daily Kos
Democracy Arsenal
Eschaton (Atrios)
Glenn Greenwald
Grist (environment blog)
Hullabaloo (Digby)
LiberalOasis
MyDD
Oliver Willis
Pandagon
Political Animal
Political Critic
Political Wire
Poor Man
Progressive Blog Digest
Real Climate
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Tapped
Talking Points Memo
Think Progress
Truth and Progress
Turn Maine Blue
Wonkette

www.BlueMassGroup.com

BMG PAC - a naming contest

by: The Editors

Thu Jun 04, 2009 at 15:39:13 PM EDT


Ernie and others have been after us to do this for a long time, and we're finally doing it.  Fasten your seatbelts:

We're starting a Political Action Committee.

The goal, of course, like that of any PAC, is to help elect candidates we like.  We could just stick with our ActBlue page.  But, among other things, a PAC will let candidates know that they are receiving support from the BMG community of interested, well-informed, progressive, politically active individuals.  That might actually count for something.

We expect to form the PAC immediately, with the idea of converting it in six months to a "People's Committee."  That is a special designation under MA campaign finance law that permits us to accept donations only from individuals, and only relatively small ones (the max is $147 per year).  We think that's in keeping with our goal that this be a truly grassroots effort.  (The six-month waiting period is required by state law.)

Now, the most important thing is what to call it.  We could just go with "BMG PAC."  But that's a little predictable.  We've also come up with "Mr. & Ms. PAC MAn," "People's Committee of the BMG Republic," "PACs vobiscum," "PACzilla," "Go PAC yourself," and "PAC the cah in Hahvahd yahd."  So obviously, we need your help.  Clever is good, especially if it also reflects BMG's identity.  Winner gets his/her choice of merchandise from the BMG store.

Go to it!

The Editors :: BMG PAC - a naming contest
Tags: , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
In keeping with the "BMG Media Empire" Theme... (6.00 / 3)
The Empire Strikes PAC

Ooooh -- I hadn't thought of swapping out "back" for PAC... (0.00 / 0)
Opens up a whole new world of possibilities:

We've got your PAC
PAC to the future

Just for starters.


[ Parent ]
If only any of us could afford to live on Nantucket (6.00 / 1)
It's be the ACK PAC.

BMG: Reality-based commentary.

I used to live there (0.00 / 0)
and the airline I worked for assigned me my first e-mail user name: SHACK.

Did I ever tell you all the TRUE story about the guy who shipped a prize-winning fish on our airline after a taxidermist had finished his work on it.  He sent the bass ack-wards!


[ Parent ]
Suggestions (6.00 / 2)
-Anti Hack PAC

PAChyderm (if republican)

-PAC mule (if democrat)

-Your CPA (for dyslexic contributors)

-Political Action Committee PAC (redundant?)

-CAP PAC (the Palindrome PAC)

-Send them PACing (term limits)


PAC PAC! (0.00 / 0)
I like the "Political Action Committee PAC".  I would also suggest to simply call it "the people's PAC".  

[ Parent ]
I like "The People's PAC" (0.00 / 0)
Or some variation. Is it already in use somewhere?
Maybe the People's Pac of MA.  

WE NEED A PUBLIC OPTION

[ Parent ]
What about Blue Mass PAC? (6.00 / 3)
Not clever, but clear...

That would have been my suggestion (6.00 / 4)
Its fun toying around with witty names, but serious is probably better in the long run.  On the other hand...

BMG Kiss of Death PAC?


[ Parent ]
Not obscure enough (0.00 / 0)
BMG KOD PAC

[ Parent ]
How about... (6.00 / 1)
True Blue PAC; or

Together We're Blue PAC; or

Blue Money PAC.

It should have blue in the name somewhere.


That's a good one (6.00 / 1)
"Together We're Blue PAC"

WE NEED A PUBLIC OPTION

[ Parent ]
Or (0.00 / 0)
Together We're Blue and Watching You PAC.
TWBWY

WE NEED A PUBLIC OPTION

[ Parent ]
PAC BMG (0.00 / 0)


WE NEED A PUBLIC OPTION

PAC Blue? (0.00 / 0)
How about PAC Blue?

I say stick with BMG (6.00 / 5)
If it's going to be the BMG PAC, then keep it identifiable with BMG.

If you're out there seeking to create a progressive, mass netroots umbrella PAC, then go with the new name. We could always use the BlogLeft Mass moniker.  

---
My thoughts are mine and mine alone. They should not be considered representative of any other organization, group or person - save me.

~Ryan.


I vote with RYAN for BMG PAC (0.00 / 0)
Serious.  Identifiable & short.

Deborah Sirotkin Butler
AmberPaw dot @aol.com

"Failure to plan is planning to fail."
Proverb


[ Parent ]
Ms. & Ms. PAC MAn, thankyouverymuch. :) (0.00 / 0)
How about ImPACted till your Blue?  No?  Then I agree with the comments above that keep it clear and to the point:
BMG PAC

But i did like PAC mule...

Click HERE and sign up: Campaign For Military Partners.


I agree with Ryan. (6.00 / 1)
The name BMG PAC promote BMG and vice versa. The BMG name is a firm foundation for building political influence. II hate to use the word branding, but that's what needs to be done.

The question to ask is, why name the PAC something else?
 

A rose by any other name is still a rose by another name.


PAC that Mass Up (0.00 / 0)
As in "Girl, you looks good won't you . . .". Joking.

BMG PAC, Blue Mass PAC are good.

Somerville for Instant Runoff Voting


Too nerdy? (6.00 / 2)
How about 010000100100110101000111 PAC

~~~~
Believe it or not, I have even more to say...


Is that EBCDIC or ASCII? (6.00 / 2)
Remember, there's only 10 types of people in the world - those who can read binary, and those who can't...

Small dollar year round fundraising: PeanutButterPAC.org

[ Parent ]
Okay (0.00 / 0)
Howzabout "You Down with BMG? Ya You Know Me PAC"

~~~~
Believe it or not, I have even more to say...


[ Parent ]
Brat PAC? (6.00 / 2)
Or should that be for the sausage industry?

---

Blue Mass. Group
So what politics do you deserve?


This old PAC went rolling home. (0.00 / 0)
"Knick-Knack PACawhack gives the dogs a bone."

Seriously though, I agree with others - keep it simple and easily identifiable.


In light of the DiMasi scandal... (6.00 / 2)
Sack Hacks PAC

BMG or MABlogLeft? (6.00 / 1)
Question:

Better to make this strictly BMG, or to broaden it to lefty MA and be stronger due to the fans of .08, LinL, RTake, et al?  I can see arguments both ways, just food for thought.

If the former, just name it BMG PAC.  Enough with the cutesy.  If the latter, just name it something else equally serious and appropriate.


Another question: Let's say I want to donate $30 to DP in 2010.  Do I:
a. Donate it myself (ActBlue, whatev) to increase DP's count of small donors and grass roots, or
b. Donate it through BMG to increase BMG's recognition (and hence influence on progressive ideas), but pad DP's numbers w.r.t. PACs -- something I generally frown upon?


Given the low dollar amount for a people's committee... (0.00 / 0)
...it seems your PAC would fit with an idea I've had rattling around in my head for the past couple of years.  Often, I've seen folks saying that they're sacrificing their morning Dunkin or Starbuck's coffee and making a contribution to their chosen candidate instead - they'll drink coffee at home, or bring a thermos of coffee to work, and donate $20 or $25 a week to their cause.  So, I came up with Peanut Butter PAC - asking folks to sacrifice some little luxury and donate that money to the cause.  One day a week, pack a peanut butter sandwich and bring it to work, instead of eating lunch in the employee cafeteria, or out at a fast food joint.  Or carpool to work and save the gas money - buy generic instead of brand name - or a host of other small ways to save a few dollars a week and donate the savings.  If you can get a few thousand members, you'll begin to move some real money around.

Carrying it further, I thought that a blog where folks could vote (weekly?  monthly?) on the worthy causes which would receive that period's bounty would be a fun way to keep members engaged and participating.  Members can make blog posts in support of their candidates prior to the voting period, and previous recipients can be blocked from new votes for a period of time.  The low dollar amount folks can contribute means that you could ask for $3.00 per week and take three weeks off per year - Thanksgiving, Christmas, and New Years weeks, maybe?  Whether members vote or not, their credit card is charged the $3.00 and the money goes where those folks who did vote say it goes.

So, PeanutButterPAC.org is available - good idea, bad idea?

Small dollar year round fundraising: PeanutButterPAC.org


Transaction costs (0.00 / 0)
I have no idea what the credit card cost is of charging

49 x $3
vs.
1 x $147

but it would be worth determining before getting folks on the $3/week plan.


[ Parent ]
Yes, you're right... (0.00 / 0)
Typically, a transaction costs $.25 to $.40, depending on your merchant account's terms, and then a percentage of the total as well, so you're right, a one-time payment of $147 would be better for the PAC.  I'd still like to have weekly or monthly "who get the money" polls, but a one-time large payment is much better than a series of small ones.

Small dollar year round fundraising: PeanutButterPAC.org

[ Parent ]
One way... (6.00 / 1)
is for the PAC to give out 1/12 of its money every month.  Regardless of month, election cycle, or otherwise.  This way, the donation is about the same amount every month, which seems more fair.  It also helps to give money early and off-cycle, which can help.

The downside is that if the PAC was sitting on $12,000 in September of an even year, it'd only be giving out $1,000.

Also, does everybody get a vote, or only donors?  Do big donors get a bigger say?


Still, I really like the elegance and simplicity.  The BMG PAC Board floats five names every month.  The PAC contributors get to vote.  Recipients limited to once per calendar year.  Recipient gets 1/12 of the kitty.

Sure, there are details to work out, but that seems pretty "clean" to me.


[ Parent ]
Yes, that's neat and tidy... (6.00 / 1)
We could also dole out the money in ninths or tenths - that way, it's all dispersed before election day, the PAC takes November and December "off" and the process starts again in January.

Thanks for kicking the idea around!  Anyone else have a thought?

Small dollar year round fundraising: PeanutButterPAC.org


[ Parent ]
Also, to address your questions... (0.00 / 0)
I'd say that only donors could vote - and there should be no "big donors", everyone contributes the max of $147 to become a member.  If you get 1000 members, you have $147,000 to spread around - that's not chicken feed!

Small dollar year round fundraising: PeanutButterPAC.org

[ Parent ]
$147 is too steep. (6.00 / 1)
There's no reason to crowd out the smaller donors.

I wonder: what if you could buy a vote for $14.70?  If there's 10 recipients a year, then a donation of $14.70 pays out (on average) ten shares of $14.70 each.  So, what if each increment of $14.70 earned the donor one vote in a month?  Give $14.70, you get a single vote in 2009.  Give $70.35, you get five votes (in different months) in 2009.  Give $147, you get ten votes (one for each month) in 2009.

This way, anyone can join anytime, and for as little as $14.70 participate as a voter.


[ Parent ]
Awesome idea! (0.00 / 0)
I think we have to put this together - email me?  It's in my profile...

Small dollar year round fundraising: PeanutButterPAC.org

[ Parent ]
Average interchange fees are 2% (0.00 / 0)
But fees on small transactions are higher.  Also if you have low transaction volume you'll pay a higher rate.  That's one of the advantage of using ActBlue.

[ Parent ]
I have some experience with forming PACs (6.00 / 1)
I agree with everyone who says serious is better.  We've had our fun.  Go with something simple.  I'm happy to share my thoughts off-line if you are interested.  Kate

Kate Donaghue, volunteer.

Seriously, isn't this discussion over? (0.00 / 0)
Who won?




I support WWF


Political insider ad network Law blog ad network
Advertise Liberally









Powered by: SoapBlox