| Commonwealth Magazine is a terrific read for anyone with a taste for state/local wonkery. The general tone, as such, tends to be relatively polite. On its blog, however, Associate Editor Michael Jonas has been critical of Tom Menino's education record, and really lays it down today: But the real knock on Menino's record isn't actually the dismal performance of the city's schools; it's his lack of a plan for fixing them that has the ambition and sweep to match the size of the problem. Add to that the fact that a call for bold change at this point would look like the mayor is running against his own 16-year record, and it's easy to see why the four-term incumbent has often leaned heavily on a mix of cheerleading, obfuscation, and denial. In the school debate, that has led Menino to sugar-coat the situation as much possible, even if it means playing loose with the facts, chalking up shortcomings to some sort of vague the-deck-is-stacked-against-us unfairness, and most recently, in what has been the mayor's most ambitious feat of fabulation, claiming that the same problems are seen everywhere, including places like Weston and Wellesley. Anyone buying that one would, as the saying goes, be a good target for those marketing swampland in Florida.
Ow! It goes on. I don't know ... I don't think the sense that the deck is stacked against urban school districts is "vague" -- there are a lot of big challenges. And it's easy to criticize "change only at the pace the bureaucracy can handle" from the outside -- harder when you have to actually engage that bureaucracy as its partner. There's no magic wand. The question is whether that's to be made an excuse for failure, and whether the failure should/can be whitewashed in the midst of a mayoral race. Elections should go to those willing to be accountable. Well, the Mayor said he would be accountable, and this election is the reckoning. |