Support BMG PAC!
About BMG PAC
Make a secure credit card contribution using Google Checkout:
$
Or send a check to BMG PAC, PO Box 877, Medford, MA 02155.
View BMG PAC's latest disclosure report


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?



FREE COPY OF BOB'S BOOK Barack Obama for Beginners to every 50th Facebook Friend!
BMG on Facebook

About
About us
Rules of the road - please read!
Formatting and multimedia tips
Email us
RSS feed

BMG TRAFFIC REPORT
Blue Mass. Swag
Creative Commons License

Event Calendar
February 2010
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* 01 02 03 04 05 06
07 08 09 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 * * * * * *
<< (add event) >>

Active Users
Currently 34 user(s) logged on.

Search




Advanced Search


Blog Roll
Massachusetts Left
.08 Acres
Below Boston
Berkshires Blog
Blue News Tribune
Chimes at Midnight
Eisenthal Report
Granby 01033
Health Care for All
Left in Lowell
MA lefty blogs
Marry in Mass.
Mass Engagement
Massachusetts Liberal
Michael Forbes-Wilcox
My Dedham
Progressive Mass.
Quriltai on the Shore
Ryan's Take
Someday I Will
ShrewsBuried
Talking Stoneham
The Fray
Universal hub

Differently-Winged
John Daley
Mass. Pro-Life
No Looking Backwards
Peter Porcupine
Pundit Review
Red Mass Group
Scaling the Hill 2010

Mass. Media
David S. Bernstein
Cambridge politics
CommonWealth Unbound
Globe bloggers
Herald bloggers
Hub Blog
Jon Keller
MassBeacon
Media Nation (Dan Kennedy)
Open Media Boston
Adam Reilly
Toll Talk (Mary Connaughton)
Weekly Dig Blog

Legal
ACS Blog
Balkinization
Election law
How Appealing
SCOTUSblog
Volokh Conspiracy

General
Accountable Strategies
Billionaires for Bush
Blue Works Better
Crooks and Liars
Daily Howler
Daily Kos
Democracy Arsenal
Eschaton (Atrios)
Glenn Greenwald
Grist (environment blog)
Hullabaloo (Digby)
LiberalOasis
MyDD
Oliver Willis
Pandagon
Political Animal
Political Critic
Political Wire
Poor Man
Progressive Blog Digest
Real Climate
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Tapped
Talking Points Memo
Think Progress
Truth and Progress
Turn Maine Blue
Wonkette

www.BlueMassGroup.com

Inspector General Investigating Grant of Gloucester Charter

by: Peter Dolan

Tue Nov 17, 2009 at 12:27:46 PM EST


(Oops. - promoted by David)

The Massachusetts Inspector General Gregory Sullivan was a guest at today's Board of Elementary and Secondary Education meeting in Malden.  The Board was again discussing the events leading to the granting of a charter for the proposed Gloucester Community Arts Charter School. In addition to Secretary Paul Reville's email, which in crystal clear language lays out the political reasons for granting the charter despite the weakness of the application, serious questions have been raised (some of which are discussed here) regarding how a state agency entrusted by the Legislature with authority to spend several million dollars to open new schools carried out their responsibilities - that is why the Inspector General is now involved.

Inspector General Sullivan stated that he was attending the meeting because it was his understanding the full Board was not aware of the investigation.  This was confirmed during the discussion: at Monday night's special Board meeting to discuss the Gloucester charter, Chair Maura Banta was aware of the investigation, but not all Board members had been informed.  

Peter Dolan :: Inspector General Investigating Grant of Gloucester Charter

In response to questioning, Sullivan recommended that the Board not make any decisions regarding the charter at this time.  Board member Kaplan moved to table discussion for a month pending completion of the investigation.  She and board member Chernow were the only two who voted to suspened the BESE discussion.

Chair Banta and other Board members cited "Gloucester's need for closure", in stark contrast to the testimony delivered by several Gloucester community members who indicated their willingness to continue the challenges to the manner in which this charter was granted.  The Board then voted 8-2 not to revoke the charter.

Tags: , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
so the end justifies the means?? (0.00 / 0)
http://www.boston.com/news/loc...

Hats off to boardmembers Harneen Chernow and Ruth Kaplan for really cutting to the core issue which was whether the Board circumvented due process in granting this charter and for calling for the BESE to hold off their vote on revocation until after the IG issued a ruling. Unfortunately their efforts were rebuffed.

When members acknowledge flaws and errors in due process and then continue to push forward knowing that there's an ongoing investigation, it does cause one to pause. There really was no harm to either side in waiting a ruling by the IG which is expected before the next meeting on Dec. 16th. It seemed that the overarching reason for not waiting was because the board felt that gosh, they'd already spent too much time on this issue and it really was time to move on... process be darned....

JG

...with liberty and justice for ALL.


Actually said out loud by a board member during the meeting (0.00 / 0)
One board member actually said that the process didn't matter if this was a good application.  What about laws?  Furthermore, he seemed to ignore that the CSO said "Do Not Recommend."

[ Parent ]
We know from Reveille's email that he wanted the Gloucester charter (0.00 / 0)
Approved for political reasons, but don't see evidence therein that it actually was approved for political reasons.  Is there other evidence?

"Perseverance is a great element of success. If you knock long enough and loud enough at the gate, you are sure to wake up somebody." -Longfellow

What would you like to see? (0.00 / 0)
Commissioner Chester overturned the recommendation of the Charter School Office's independent evaluators.  The thinking behind that decision is, at best, thinly documented.

Chester then neglects to inform the Board members that he had overturned the CSO evaluators' recommendation - his action only came to light as part of a public records request.  (This must be slightly embarrassing to Board member Fortmann, who voted to grant the charter, and who publicly praised the work of the CSO evaluators - this may not have been during the meeting to vote on the charter.)

That pattern was repeated this week when Chair Banta and Secretary Reville, who were informed of the Inspector General's investigation last week, neglected to inform the other Board members prior to Monday night's special meeting to discuss the Gloucester charter.

At the Board's February 2009 meeting, Reville and the Patrick administration's other two team members (Chair Maura Banta and top education advisor Dana Mohler-Faria) cast the deciding votes after Chair Banta cuts off Board member Howard who wants to discuss claims made in the application and then brings the matter to a vote so Board member Chertavian (another vote in favor or the charter) can leave to catch a plane.  This is after she rearranged the agenda to accommodate Chertavian's schedule (though she give different reasons for the reordering of the agenda during the meeting: to accommodate Chertaivian as the meeting is starting, because so many people are there from Gloucester later).

I could go on...

Of course it's always hard to discuss this without mentioning the Board citing an irrelevant regulation to retroactively waive the requirement for a member to attend a public hearing.


[ Parent ]
But these other votes in favor of the charter (0.00 / 0)
We know only that they were made and that some (who opposed the charter) felt there were problems with the process.

This doesn't appear to show that those in favor, apart from Reveille, did not genuinely support this charter - that they were in favor for political reasons only.  

 

"Perseverance is a great element of success. If you knock long enough and loud enough at the gate, you are sure to wake up somebody." -Longfellow


[ Parent ]
Inspector General Investigating Grant (0.00 / 0)
I was at the meeting.

It was a sad day for democracy.

I wanted to ask what Welch asked of McCarthy 50 years ago, "Have you no decency?"

I am an ardent Democrat. Have been for more than 35 year and am switching over to support whoever runs against Patrick next time. Patrick's Administration is a huge disappointment.

Ed Shoucair


IG investigating Charter approval process (0.00 / 0)
Link update to today's full story:

http://www.boston.com/news/edu...

...with liberty and justice for ALL.


So? (0.00 / 0)
The Patrick Administration and Legislature has demonstrated it could care less what the Inspector General has to say.

We already have one issue that the IG has called the state's biggest financial scandal of the past 20 years and the Patrick Administration and Legislature has done absolutely nothing about it.

(Don't know what I'm referring to? Exactly.)





I support WWF


Political insider ad network Law blog ad network
Advertise Liberally









Powered by: SoapBlox