Act Blue!
BMG endorses these candidates for election in 2010! Help them win - fill in a donation amount and click "Contribute" to be directed to BMG's Act Blue page.
Deval Patrick (MA-Gov) $
Mac D'Alessandro (MA-09) $
Jim McGovern (MA-03) $
Jack Conway (KY-Sen) $





Support BMG PAC!
About BMG PAC
Make a secure credit card contribution using Google Checkout:
$
Or send a check to BMG PAC, PO Box 877, Medford, MA 02155.
View BMG PAC's latest disclosure report


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?



FREE COPY OF BOB'S BOOK Barack Obama for Beginners to every 100th Facebook Friend!

BMG on Facebook

About
About us
Rules of the road - please read!
Formatting and multimedia tips
Email us
RSS feed

BMG TRAFFIC REPORT
Blue Mass. Swag
Creative Commons License

Event Calendar
August 2010
(view month)
S M T W R F S
01 02 03 04 05 06 07
08 09 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31 * * * *
<< (add event) >>

Active Users
Currently 2 user(s) logged on.

Search




Advanced Search


Blog Roll
Massachusetts Left
.08 Acres
Below Boston
Berkshires Blog
Blue News Tribune
Chimes at Midnight
Eisenthal Report
Granby 01033
Health Care for All
Left in Lowell
MA lefty blogs
Marry in Mass.
Mass Engagement
Massachusetts Liberal
Michael Forbes-Wilcox
My Dedham
Progressive Mass.
Quriltai on the Shore
Ryan's Take
Someday I Will
ShrewsBuried
Talking Stoneham
The Fray
Universal hub

Differently-Winged
John Daley
Mass. Pro-Life
No Looking Backwards
Peter Porcupine
Pundit Review
Red Mass Group
Scaling the Hill 2010

Mass. Media
David S. Bernstein
Cambridge politics
CommonWealth Unbound
Globe bloggers
Herald bloggers
Hub Blog
Jon Keller
MassBeacon
MA Election 2010
Media Nation (Dan Kennedy)
Open Media Boston
Adam Reilly
Toll Talk (Mary Connaughton)
Weekly Dig Blog
Wicked Local Politics

Legal
ACS Blog
Balkinization
Election law
How Appealing
SCOTUSblog
Volokh Conspiracy

General
Accountable Strategies
Billionaires for Bush
Blue Works Better
Crooks and Liars
Daily Howler
Daily Kos
Democracy Arsenal
Eschaton (Atrios)
Glenn Greenwald
Grist (environment blog)
Hullabaloo (Digby)
LiberalOasis
MyDD
Oliver Willis
Pandagon
Political Animal
Political Critic
Political Wire
Poor Man
Progressive Blog Digest
Real Climate
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Tapped
Talking Points Memo
Think Progress
Truth and Progress
Turn Maine Blue
Wonkette

www.BlueMassGroup.com

The fake Obama photo from the Boston police union's newspaper

by: David

Mon Mar 15, 2010 at 13:25:01 PM EDT


There was a short item in the Globe over the weekend about complaints from "several minority officers" in the Boston Police Department regarding the content of "Pax Centurion," the newspaper published every other month by the Boston police union.  Just for context, here's one of the items mentioned in the Globe story, from the January/February 2010 issue (PDF - it's on page C3).  (Click for larger image.)

Now, as a 5-second Google search quickly reveals by bringing up the excellent explanation at snopes.com, this image is a fake -- despite the photoshopping in which the creator moved the Obamas' wedding rings and flipped the President's suit buttons and lapel pin.  Here, borrowed from snopes.com, is the real photograph from which the doctored one was taken.  Note that in this image, the First Lady's hair is parted on the left, as it is in every other real photograph of her (but is not in the one shown above).

Pretty disappointing that a Boston police officer would go to the trouble of reprinting such an obvious fake; profess to believe that it's real; and then take the appalling next step of questioning whether the President and First Lady of the United States "are really Americans."  And also disappointing that the newspaper put out by the union would print this kind of garbage without doing even the most cursory investigation into it.

David :: The fake Obama photo from the Boston police union's newspaper
If you're interested, all the back issues are archived on the union's website.  If you peruse them, you'll learn that the union really really hates Governor Patrick, almost exclusively as a result of two issues, the Quinn bill and police details.  You'll see a bunch of other odd stuff too (examples: from page C12 of the Nov/Dec 2009 edition: the false claim that "the ACLU has filed a suit to have all military cross-shaped headstones removed"; and from page A3 of the Sept/Oct 2009 edition, the newspaper editor's opinion that homeless people seeking handouts at intersections "are lazy pigs seeking funds to buy booze, cigarettes and drugs from idiot suburban morons who are stupid enough to give them anything" and are "an army of mendicant sloths").

Your perusal will also reveal large, full-color advertisements from many of Boston's biggest businesses.  Now, the newspaper does have a disclaimer of sorts on its front page that reads

The advertisers of the Pax Centurion do not necessarily endorse the opinions of the Pax Centurion/Boston Police Patrolmen's Association. The advertisers are in support of the BPPA Scholarship Fund and every patrolmen [sic] who risks his or her life to protect and serve the community.

Well, fair enough.  Still, one does wonder whether the advertisers are aware of quite how ... unusual ... some of the "opinions" expressed in Pax Centurion really are.  In the Globe piece, Pax's editor was quoted as follows:

James Carnell, managing editor of Pax Centurion, said the pieces were contributed by union members, whose politics trend to the right.

"Our members do tend to be on the conservative end, and we allow editorial expression from our members,'' he said.

"Trend to the right"?  "On the conservative end"?  No.  Giant headlines questioning whether the Obamas are "really Americans?????" plastered over obviously doctored photographs are not "on the conservative end."  That's the stuff of the extreme fringe.  The birthers.  Those guys.

Oh, I also enjoyed the droll Christmas poem printed on page A1 of the Nov/Dec 2009 issue.  Here's how it starts:

Twas the night before Christmas, and throughout Schroeder Plaza
The cops were as angry as Palestinians in Gaza.
Their pay and their benefits were under the knife,
And the media's attacks made a miserable life.

The Palestinians in Gaza.  Really.  Look, say what you want about the Governor's position on details and the Quinn bill, but the situation in Gaza is about a good deal more than controversial job perks.  Let's try to keep some semblance of perspective.

Tags: , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
I'm still astonished (6.00 / 5)
that, despite the new blossoming of down-home 'patriotic dissent' a la tea parties, few from that faction are willing to say what's really got them riled up: our president is African-American.  The lengths they go to to try to couch their racism (denying legitimate birth certificate, alleged death squads, etc.) are hilarious for their absurdity.  Why won't they just come clean and start using the N word unabashedly?  It's not like they're fooling anyone.

Click HERE and sign up: Campaign For Military Partners.

I agree. (6.00 / 2)
Tarted up racism and nothing more, but only a few have the courage to call it for what it is.  

BTW, they can't use the "N" word--it's sort of passe.  The Onion has the lowdown:

Racial Slur Development Not Keeping Pace With Mixed-Race Births, Nation's Bigots Report:

WASHINGTON-A coalition of the nation's most fervent bigots convened in Washington Monday to address growing concerns that the production of hateful new racial slurs has failed to keep pace with the rise in mixed-race births.

According to representatives from the American Racists and Bigots Council (ARBC), the growing number of children born to parents of different ethnicities has posed a real challenge to the nation's hate-speech developers-a challenge they say threatens their way of life.



[ Parent ]
There's some racism to it but... (6.00 / 2)
The sort of people who propagate these pictures don't think that any Democrats are real Americans. The fact that Barack Obama is a member of a "visible minority" just adds more fuel to the fire.

I mean, it's not like Bill Clinton was treated with kid gloves: people were literally arguing that he and Hillary had a man killed (Vince Foster, among others) for personal gain.


[ Parent ]
Its, (6.00 / 1)
... Eliminaationist.

"It is not because things are difficult that we do not dare, it is because we do not dare that things are difficult." - Seneca (5 BC - 65 AD)

[ Parent ]
what about ? (0.00 / 0)
John McCain being born in Panama, or Goldwater being born in the "Arizona Territory" or Lowell Weicker being born in Paris? It's all hogwash but it's not limited to any one party.

[ Parent ]
Classification... (6.00 / 2)
... as not 'real' Americans is eliminationist. While you are correct that it isn't limited to one party, the disparity is overwhelming.  This shouldn't be too surprising, once you realize that the GOP appeals to authoritarians

"It is not because things are difficult that we do not dare, it is because we do not dare that things are difficult." - Seneca (5 BC - 65 AD)

[ Parent ]
Every politician will have their detractors (6.00 / 2)
It's the method the detractors choose to use that is of interest here.  Has any white president been accused of not being an actual American citizen but rather the citizen of their ancestor's homeland?  No.  Clinton may have been accused of murder, but his fundamental citizenship was never in question.

Click HERE and sign up: Campaign For Military Partners.

[ Parent ]
And... (6.00 / 2)
I don't recall large popular rallies endlessly decrying Clinton's alleged murder and therefor his right to remain president.  But with Obama The Black Man, they just don't let up.

Click HERE and sign up: Campaign For Military Partners.

[ Parent ]
Actually George Romney's citizenship was questioned (0.00 / 0)
...back in 1968.

He was born in Mexico of American parents.


[ Parent ]
Its amazing that... (0.00 / 0)
with so many real issues going in on politics today that people bother with these crude forgeries. I agree - its just racism. Or more likely people with nothing to add to the dialogue resorting to this sort of garbage.

Then again, why is BMG bothering to dredge this drivel up? Surely there are legitimate issues we should be discussing.

Like the governor's race.

Massachusetts Election 2010
We dig up the dirt so you don't have to.


[ Parent ]
Bringing up legitimate issues... (6.00 / 5)
... seems not to be the m.o. of the most active part of the GOP and the tea party movement.  I'd love a real policy debate.  Most liberals would.  Instead this is the kind of s#!t we get.

"It is not because things are difficult that we do not dare, it is because we do not dare that things are difficult." - Seneca (5 BC - 65 AD)

[ Parent ]
Eh? (6.00 / 5)
Surely there are legitimate issues we should be discussing.

Like the governor's race.

The governor's race is a longstanding topic on this site.  Are you so new you haven't even been reading?  Tangentially, the governor is the topic of multiple front-page posts and diaries every single day.  

I see you joined this site on Saturday, March 13.  You've made a grand total of two comments, both of which-- the one I'm responding to and this one-- appear to castigate people for what they're talking about.   Seems kind of strange to enter a site complaining about the people on it, no?

How about you write a diary when you're able about the things "we should be discussing."  Perhaps you can drive the conversation then towards something more of your liking.   Until then, finger-wagging and scolding isn't going to endear you to anyone.   Maybe you've just had a bad day?


[ Parent ]
Since when is discussion of vile racism (6.00 / 4)
expressed by people with authority to kill "drivel"?  I think it's one of the most important issues out there.

Click HERE and sign up: Campaign For Military Partners.

[ Parent ]
So the culture stinks (0.00 / 0)
and it, at least a little bit, negatively affects all folks who live, work, shop, or otherwise visit Boston.

What to do about it?


Call it out. (6.00 / 3)
Unless people call out such things, why ever rely on substance when just lying works so well?

"It is not because things are difficult that we do not dare, it is because we do not dare that things are difficult." - Seneca (5 BC - 65 AD)

[ Parent ]
Is there not a handful of reality based cops (6.00 / 1)
who are willing to write letters to the editor (of PAX or, ahem, a real newspaper) calling out the newsletter on it's terrible behavior?

Curious about this (6.00 / 2)
I often wonder whether being a police officer attracts conservatives or whether the experience of being a police officers fosters conservatism.

[ Parent ]
Completely anecdotal, (6.00 / 3)
but I've come to the conclusion that law enforcement and military service generally attract more conservative personalities (myself excluded).

In the years I've been teaching an elective in Peace Studies, I inevitably get kids who didn't choose the course but were forced to take it due to scheduling difficulties.  During the semester, I have kids take several political, social, and personality inventories to help them get a handle on where they fit on a variety of spectrums.  The kids who tend to skew conservative are often kids planning on military careers or law enforcement.  Every semester I have at least 1 or 2 that break that way.  

When you think about Haidt's Five Foundations graphing, Jung's Typology, and Political Compass's quadrant plotting, I can generally guess which kids are interested in those careers by how they place on those inventories.  Anecdotal but interesting.  


[ Parent ]
People who... (6.00 / 1)
... respect and depend on authority more than the average person tend to wind up conservative.

I really recommend the read, and its free. :)

"It is not because things are difficult that we do not dare, it is because we do not dare that things are difficult." - Seneca (5 BC - 65 AD)


[ Parent ]
Salience (6.00 / 1)
  1. If you principally interact with people of color by stopping, warning, or arresting them, you could develop a skewed perception of non-whites.
  2. By its nature, working in law enforcement requires one to interact with lots of people different from oneself under a stressful circumstances. Unless one has been trained into the full range of social and cultural responses, one is very likely to conclude that people of different backgrounds are idiotic or hostile — if only because of the fundamental attribution error.
  3. For years I've been joking that people whose bumperstickers agree with my politics are the very worst drivers. I'm surprised how often this is born out and it would certainly give the constabulary a dim view of liberals — that is if there's any truth to my observation.*
Could it be that the more professional a police force, the less likely experience will foster conservatism?
* I believe (?) Mr. Lynne has observed that this is because it's anger that motivates sticking stuff to bumpers.

[ Parent ]
Yah! (6.00 / 2)
Only non-Americans like Teddy Roosevelt, George Washington, Abraham Lincoln, and that nobody Thomas Jefferson don't know how to do the pledge?

(PS:  Ever talk to a foreigner about the Pledge of Allegiance?  They typically regard it as baffling and/or creepy.)

~~~~
Believe it or not, I have even more to say...


Well, most nations aren't nations of immigrants (0.00 / 0)
Over the past 200 years, how many people became American citizens?  How does that compare to citizens of other countries?

[ Parent ]
I don't care what foreigners think of the Pledge. (4.67 / 3)


[ Parent ]
Right on! (6.00 / 4)
As we all know, people from other countries aren't capable of reasoning properly, so their opinions should always be disregarded.

Something there is that doesn't love a wall,
That wants it down.


[ Parent ]
Not always. (5.00 / 1)
I like their opinions on universal healthcare and beer- at least the Canadians and the Europeans.  

[ Parent ]
I agree with the foreigners. (5.50 / 2)
I've come to kind of hate the pledge of allegiance. It conjures up images of submission, intolerance, blind obedience, complacency, and even idolatry. But then again, I like the National Anthem- maybe it's the melody?
Anyway, I certainly don't presume to speak for Obama- he probably likes the pledge just fine.  

[ Parent ]
National Anthem (6.00 / 2)
A great and beautiful poem, set to a drinking song. What could be BETTER really??? :D

Left in Lowell: cuz why read the Lowell Sun if you don't have to? ;)

[ Parent ]
True (0.00 / 0)
But what a limp drinking song.  Can you imagine hoisting a tankard to "Anacreon in Heaven"?  

~~~~
Believe it or not, I have even more to say...


[ Parent ]
Hence (6.00 / 1)
The changing of the words so we can now drink to America!

With the watered down and tasteless swill we produce! ;)

Left in Lowell: cuz why read the Lowell Sun if you don't have to? ;)


[ Parent ]
Most people can't sing it though (6.00 / 1)
For a drinking song, a melody that is beyond the ability of most carousers has a certain painful gamin poignancy.

For the national ditty, the song that we all sing together at the start of baseball games and Town Meeting, more tuneful would be better.


[ Parent ]
FREE BIRD! (6.00 / 1)


Shoe bomber, underwear bomber -- why aren't we waging war on clothes?

[ Parent ]
I can't sing it... (0.00 / 0)
...all the way through unless I start on just the right note.  My range is too narrow.

[ Parent ]
I don't personally care for it myself but have to endure it (0.00 / 0)
on a daily basis.  Even the language around the pledge activity is enough to give one pause:

CHAPTER 71. PUBLIC SCHOOLS

SCHOOLHOUSES

Chapter 71: Section 69. Display of national flags; pledge of allegiance; penalty for violation

Section 69. The school committee shall provide for each schoolhouse under its control, which is not otherwise supplied, flags of the United States of silk or bunting not less than two feet long, such flags or bunting to be manufactured in the United States, and suitable apparatus for their display as hereinafter provided. A flag shall be displayed, weather permitting, on the school building or grounds on every school day and on every legal holiday or day proclaimed by the governor or the President of the United States for especial observance; provided, that on stormy school days, it shall be displayed inside the building. A flag shall be displayed in each assembly hall or other room in each such schoolhouse where the opening exercises on each school day are held. Each teacher at the commencement of the first class of each day in all grades in all public schools shall lead the class in a group recitation of the "Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag". A flag shall be displayed in each classroom in each such schoolhouse. Failure for a period of five consecutive days by the principal or teacher in charge of a school equipped as aforesaid to display the flag as above required, or failure for a period of two consecutive weeks by a teacher to salute the flag and recite said pledge as aforesaid, or to cause the pupils under his charge so to do, shall be punished for every such period by a fine of not more than five dollars. Failure of the committee to equip a school as herein provided shall subject the members thereof to a like penalty.

Ja wohl.  While there are civil liberterian issues that arise around pledges, most schools take a more tolerant and respectful approach to the pledge activity.  We have a fair amount of kids who remain silent each day and some who don't even stand.    


[ Parent ]
i wonder if anyone has ever gotten the $5 fine (0.00 / 0)


[ Parent ]
I remember in high school, (0.00 / 0)
We only did the Pledge in homeroom... which we only had once a week. It was a thankful departure after having to say the Pledge just about every day for the first 14 years of my life. I guess that's in violation of that law... but certainly no one ever complained.  

---
My thoughts are mine and mine alone. They should not be considered representative of any other organization, group or person - save me.

~Ryan.


[ Parent ]
That's Fine (0.00 / 0)
The Pledge should be given according to current state law.

No student should EVER be be rewarded, punished, or questioned for taking or not taking the Pledge.

I took the Pledge throughout my schooling, viewing it as a matter of routine that was a nice thought but not of primary importance.

If a politician tries to eliminate the Pledge, that politician will lose 25% of their support, due to fake outrage, and would in most cases not get re-elected. Fake outrage can be a VERY good campaign strategy for a challenger.

Handling it this way would comply with the current law and avoid potential lawsuits from students, saving the School Department's funds for the ACADEMIC PROGRAM, not culture war idiocy for some candidate without real policy positions to offer the voters.


[ Parent ]
I'm pretty sure... (6.00 / 1)
...the Supreme Court requires that your second paragraph be true.

[ Parent ]
A tool to Americanize the children of immigrants? (0.00 / 0)
In 1892 the adoption of the Pledge may well have calmed some fears of the great waves of immigration washing upon the shores of America.  A reminder that you're in the melting pot and don't owe allegiance to the Tsar, Kaiser, King or Emperor anymore.  As such, it is archaic but served a purpose.  I feel good to hear kids recite it (social continuity?), but wouldn't mind if they didn't.  

As far as the police go, they'd make a better impression as Americans if they would obey the country's laws, stop protecting the dirty brother officers through omerta, and show respect for other citizens.  Maybe that is more important than a Pledge of Allegiance.  


[ Parent ]
Would they like it better if it were in a tennis court? (6.00 / 1)


[ Parent ]
Cops are a "funny" bunch. (0.00 / 0)
Most that I've been social with tend to be Republican. No surprise there. But a few, especially after a couple of beers, when they think they are in "safe" company, say some pretty outrageous things. I've witnessed it several times over the years.

Race, gender, GLBT, Clinton, "Hippies", Obama, "scum" in general, etc... have all been brought up in ways that professional law enforcement officers should really avoid.

Depending on the situation I have sometimes argued, but more often than not, the offending party would just get a few rolled eyes from his friends and be treated like the mouthy closet-racist Uncle at Thanksgiving.

What shocks me about this is that the Union seems to confuse free speech with slander when it comes to their paper. It is truly outrageous and needs to stop.

On a related note, my brother is an airline pilot (retired Navy Capt. who is a loud and proud liberal! very rare.) who is also the legislative rep for his union local. He spends a lot of time out on the web message boards for the union. The absolute right wing insanity that sometimes gets spewed makes places like freerepublic.com seem tame. However, I doubt that junk like that ever makes the Newsletter. Oy.


if Dems had any balls... (4.00 / 4)
We would absolutely skull-fuck the police unions.  They aren't our friends; they never have been.  Oh, and of course their benefits are substantively ridiculous and bankrupting the government.  Axe their perks, end all details tomorrow, put their entitled retirees into Medicare with the rest of us peasants, tax pension amounts over a certain level (perhaps where SS tops out... around 60k), institute a hard 140k cap on public sector income (the same as the Gov).  

Do it for reason's sake, not spite (6.00 / 5)
We all need cops to protect our shit from thieves, catch rapists and murderers, etc. Most of them are good, hard-working people.

[ Parent ]
The vocal minority (0.00 / 0)
of a-holes and authoritarian overlords make it hard to see past those who aren't good, hardworking individuals. And none of it means Ed Poon isn't right. We need to get rid of details, at least, and Medicare should be mandatory for all retirees from the public sector, whether you were a cop or a Governor. Quite frankly, I can't understand what they have to complain about... no public sector employees are treated as well, in salary and benefits, on the aggregate, as cops.  

---
My thoughts are mine and mine alone. They should not be considered representative of any other organization, group or person - save me.

~Ryan.


[ Parent ]
can't it be reason and spite? (5.00 / 1)


[ Parent ]
Spite... (0.00 / 0)
... against those who would fight policy arguments with lies isn't much of a vice.  Against those who would use lies to spread unjustified fear and hate, even less so.

"It is not because things are difficult that we do not dare, it is because we do not dare that things are difficult." - Seneca (5 BC - 65 AD)

[ Parent ]
Punish the many for the sins of a few (6.00 / 1)
Always an awesome philosophy, leads to great policies. And here I thought you were among those who prizes reason over emotion, Mr. Lynne.

[ Parent ]
oh goody, the old "it's just a few bad apples" defense. (5.33 / 3)
This racist crap ran in a publication put out by the police union - it's not "just" something forwarded over email by one cop.

Something there is that doesn't love a wall,
That wants it down.


[ Parent ]
Read the Globe story? (6.00 / 1)
At least some officers clearly found the material objectionable. Membership in the union is a requirement of employment, AFAIK, and I doubt more than a handful of officers have anything to do with determining the editorial content of the newsletter, authoring editorials, etc. I could be wrong.

[ Parent ]
If so (6.00 / 2)
then the union should smack those few down but hard, and publicly, because not to do so is to tacitly support this kind of thing (much like, though on a much smaller scale, the discussion on the other thread re: the Catholic church).  It's a basic principle that if members of an organization, acting in their capacity as members of that organization, do objectionable or illegal things, it's the organization's responsibility to deal with them in an appropriate manner, and if it doesn't, their behavior reflects on the organization as a whole.  It's true for Enron, it's true for the Catholic church, it's true for the Army and Abu Ghraib, it's true for the US Government and Gitmo, it's true for the Boston police union.

Something there is that doesn't love a wall,
That wants it down.


[ Parent ]
Who said anything about... (0.00 / 0)
... spite for those aside from those who lie?  If they, as an institution, are going to take stands like these, I have no problem criticizing the institution, even spitefully.  The correct response for those who are associated with the institution but otherwise 'innocent' is shame.  

I'm not saying I recommend it in all cases, but offense expressed in spite can be channeled usefully in some cases.  I'm not sure whether this would make sense in this case, but I'm certainly open to hearing the extent of dissatisfaction.  I would say that Ed's might sound extreme, but if you take out the call for 'skull-fucking', his policy prescriptions aren't exactly out of bounds, and might be valid methods of 'push-back' toward useful ends for the Commonwealth and might still be fair to Police as workers.  I acknowledge that there is push-push dynamic in dealing with the union and if the Commonwealth should determine that it's time to push back, that's to be expected even if you want to call it 'spite'.

"It is not because things are difficult that we do not dare, it is because we do not dare that things are difficult." - Seneca (5 BC - 65 AD)


[ Parent ]
I agree with the policy recommendations (0.00 / 0)
Just not the idea that it should be done as retaliation for this ad, out of hatred for all cops.

[ Parent ]
Spite.... (6.00 / 2)
... might just be another word for reciprocity.  If you throw the ball, you should expect to have the ball thrown back.  If the policy prescriptions are good on their own right, then the motivation of wanting to push back in order to get them done isn't misplaced.  It'd be misplaced if the prescribed push back was something unju stified.

"It is not because things are difficult that we do not dare, it is because we do not dare that things are difficult." - Seneca (5 BC - 65 AD)

[ Parent ]
this does nothing to improve my opinion (0.00 / 0)
of the rank-and-file cop. Clearly, the wrong people are becoming cops far too often.  

---
My thoughts are mine and mine alone. They should not be considered representative of any other organization, group or person - save me.

~Ryan.


The wrong people are everywhere (6.00 / 3)
Politics, business, bureaucracies, the priesthood. C'est la vie. There's a police exam coming up soon- any interest in being a crimefighter?

[ Parent ]
Sure, (6.00 / 4)
but the wrong person in business can't arrest someone, or use a taser on them for no legitimate reason.

---
My thoughts are mine and mine alone. They should not be considered representative of any other organization, group or person - save me.

~Ryan.


[ Parent ]
scary (6.00 / 1)
Just f-in scary.

OATHKEEPERS (6.00 / 1)
http://oath-keepers.blogspot.com/

Is BPD infected?

From the "Pax Centurion" Newsletter:

But Comm. Davis, seeking to curry favor withhis friends on the Boston Globe's editorial board, (who, of course, applauded his bold, new initiative) has announcedthe BPD's equivalent of the "re-invention of the wheel" in a rather crass attempt to pad his resume for future political aspirations and to gain accolades from his media consorts.

Maybe it has always been this way. Sad & Scary.

A consensus formed from the echo of parrots, is no consensus.
I'm Jack Mitchell and I'm confused by this message.


[ Parent ]
Like any other group, (6.00 / 1)
cops can be jerks. When jerks reach a critical mass, you get a culture of jerkdom. I don't have any dope on the BPD, but the Springfield Police Department has had its share of winners.

The Springfield Police Department has some good cops, but racism is a continuing problem. In the 90s, one Springfield cop was fired for leaving messages on the answering machine of a black minister. I think he was the same guy who sent a ham to a cop who happened to shoot a black man. More recently, a black man, apparently a drug dealer was beaten and called the "n-word. The cop in question has a checkered past. If the evidence bears the charges out, he could face hate crime charges.

In 1991, Andy Card helped connect a Republican dirty trickster with the Springfield police union to picket the Democratic State Convention in Springfield. The cops, who said they wanted to draw attention to their stalled contract negotiations, had no beef with Massachusetts Democrats; they were really acting as Republican operatives intent on disturbing the convention.

My father was a delegate that year and witnessed the thuggery first hand. The State Democratic Party eventually
sued the Republican operative with Card connections and the Springfield police union... in Hampden County Superior Court alleging that he and Republican activist Stephen DeAngelis conspired with the head of the police union to have police picket outside the site of the Democrats' nominating convention.

These examples are no excuse for trashing every police department and its union in the state. I know a lot of folks around here think unions kidnap babies and use them in satanic rituals, but forchrissakes, get a grip.

And go after the BPD union!

The ideas of the ruling class are in every epoch the ruling ideas, i.e. the class which is the ruling material force of society, is at the same time its ruling intellectual force.

--Karl Marx, German Ideology (1845)


[ Parent ]
Political-Geographic Citizenship (0.00 / 0)
American Citizenship is Political-Geographic. It is based on either being naturalized or being born on certain parcels of land (geographic) that the United States Constitution rules over (political). It has nothing to do with race, nationality, or religion in any way.

Hawaii, where Obama was born, became a state in 1959. He was born in 1961 in the State of Hawaii to Ann Dunham, an American Citizen. He has citizenship based on both descent from his US citizen mother and being born in the State of Hawaii.

Trying to create fake outrage about mom and apple pie (non)-issues such as The Pledge of Allegience done incorrectly (in doctored pictures) is idiotic, moronic, and beneath contempt.

It also shows that if there is a "flag-desecration" Constitutional Amendment, it will be abused by prosecutors to punish people who disagree with them about politics.

This does not mean that I support Obama politically at this time. I am basically part of the left opposition to him at this point. But my disagreements are about things that really matter, such as economic and foreign policy. I have no time for adult versions of kindergarten "IWWW-POOO-PEEEES", which is what this type of thing is.


Those advertisements (0.00 / 0)
Regarding this comment by David,

Your perusal will also reveal large, full-color advertisements from many of Boston's biggest businesses.

if you own a business, large or small, you have probably received telephone calls from numerous organizations claiming to represent some police-related interest, asking for a "donation" by means of placing an ad in a newspaper or event program.  There's the Fraternal Order of Police, the Massachusetts Police Association, the Mass. Coalition of Police, the Police Benevolent Association, etc. etc. I've never really understood how that fund-raising adds to public safety, or how it really goes to charity.

According to a group that tracks the efficiency of charitable organizations,

[o]f the 18 police and firefighter charities evaluated by Charity Navigator 12 attribute more than 20% of their expenses to fundraising costs. Of these, 7 are spending more than 75% on fundraising, with one police charity spending more than 90% on fundraising!

But the sad truth is that no business wants to say no to the police when they call looking for their protection money, I mean, their contributions, which is why those ads are known in the ad business as "stick up" ads.


Link? (0.00 / 0)
Just curious, which organization spends 90% on fundraising?

[ Parent ]
Link (0.00 / 0)
CharityNavigaor.com

"It is not because things are difficult that we do not dare, it is because we do not dare that things are difficult." - Seneca (5 BC - 65 AD)

[ Parent ]
typo (0.00 / 0)
CharityNavigator.com

"It is not because things are difficult that we do not dare, it is because we do not dare that things are difficult." - Seneca (5 BC - 65 AD)

[ Parent ]
Just for the sake of argument... (0.00 / 0)
...if the Obama's DID use their left hands is it really worth getting upset about?  I mean, I probably cringe more than the most when the flag is not treated or respected properly (HUGE pet peeve of mine), but I don't go calling people evil or unpatriotic over it.

The teabagger narrative (6.00 / 4)
is that an elite has taken over the country, surreptitiously, cleverly, and shrewdly. They expect the evidence to be convincing but obscure.

So yes, to some Americans this would be telling evidence that the Obamas never attended American schools.


[ Parent ]
Unlike of course... (6.00 / 1)
...the "non-elites" who wrote our Declaration and Constitution to begin with, right.

[ Parent ]
LOL! (6.00 / 1)
You know that irony had not occurred to me, but it is significant.

[ Parent ]
Isn't "Investigation" one of the many jobs the police are charged with? (6.00 / 2)
Odd that no one affiliated with this "ad" would use Google to verify the photo.

Or is it......?


return on investment... (0.00 / 0)
this image is a fake -- despite the photoshopping in which the creator moved the Obamas' wedding rings and flipped the President's suit buttons and lapel pin.  Here, borrowed from snopes.com, is the real photograph from which the doctored one was taken.  Note that in this image, the First Lady's hair is parted on the left, as it is in every other real photograph of her (but is not in the one shown above).

The background has also been moved to eliminate the Marine saluting behind her elbow: a left handed salute would have been a dead giveaway. It's also cropped closely to avoid picturing the Marine at his elbow.

I find it fascinating, not to mention pathetic, how much effort went into what is, essentially, very little payoff... It's like a miniature Starr report...   Do the college Republicans really have that much time on their hands... ?  

---

"Providing health care to the uninsured is a job killer, while not providing health care is merely a people killer....   Bonus: Job Openings!!"

--Stephen Colbert


it's simpler than that. (6.00 / 1)
The background has also been moved to eliminate the Marine saluting behind her elbow: a left handed salute would have been a dead giveaway.

The dead giveaway is the digital photo of the President of the United States of America using his left hand, found on the Internet.  To anybody with a shred of sanity or intelligence, that's the giveaway.

Really -- the cop who put this in the paper should lose his job.  Not because of the political "speech", but because as GregR points out, these are the professionals who are in charge of gathering evidence and investigating.  Not being able to determine that this is a fake indicates that the person who put it in is a lousy cop, plain and simple.  A clear lack of judgment and the inability to even do a cursory investigation before introducing so-called-evidence which, if false or doctored could still be terribly damaging to an innocent citizen (in this case the POTUS and FL).


P.S. The image below is not proof that Dick Cheney is a Nazi.  If a police office thought it was, he too should be fired.



[ Parent ]
Well, that's what we have juries, judges, and defense lawyers for. (0.00 / 0)
The criminal justice system would be pretty scary indeed if cops served as investigators, juries, and executioners. The POTUS is not really your average innocent citizen, either. Wasn't it John Adams who initiated the Alien and Sedition Acts because people were writing critical, and perhaps slanderous and untrue, things about him? Not his finest moment, to be sure. Certainly nobody should be subjected to false accusations, but I think the President needs to have pretty thick skin in order to stay sane as the leader of 300 million diverse citizens, and pretty much the most powerful person in the world. I don't see the cop getting fired for this extracurricular activity, and I don't think I agree that he should be. His "journalism" has been discredited, to be sure, and he shouldn't be working on the newsletter- but he's not a trained journalist. What about an anonymous blogger (perhaps who works during the day as a scientific researcher) who makes a false political accusation based on unreliable evidence discovered on the Internet? Fired from the day job for poorly researched political speech?  I didn't even agree with what happened to Dan Rather, and he was a professional journalist. So I think firing the cop would be too extreme- fire them for planting evidence, lying on the stand, or beating suspects to death, by all means- but not for bad journalism.  

[ Parent ]
Not the point (6.00 / 2)
the President needs to have pretty thick skin

Honestly, I don't think anyone here cares whether President Obama's feelings are hurt.

Something there is that doesn't love a wall,
That wants it down.


[ Parent ]
How about an ethical or moral compass? (5.67 / 3)
I don't see the cop getting fired for this extracurricular activity, and I don't think I agree that he should be. His "journalism" has been discredited, to be sure, and he shouldn't be working on the newsletter- but he's not a trained journalist.

How about s/he should be fired for publishing lies about people in general and the president in particular?  How about we don't "frame" people by altering the truth to suit one's own purposes?  How about we don't smear other people's reputations with what you euphemistically call "bad journalism," but which in truth is actually bald-faced lies to suit our own purposes?  

Part of the responsibility of being a public servant, especially one that is charged with enforcing standards of behavior, is to uphold a certain ethical and moral standard.  This individual has failed in that respect miserably and should be fired immediately.  


[ Parent ]
The cop shouldn't be fired, because the boss has nothing to do with it. (6.00 / 1)
The cop shouldn't be fired, period.  

This speech is stupid, inaccurate and offensive.  It saddens me that the cops who are running the union paper are either this stupid or this mean-spirited, but they have the right to say these stupid things and no one should be fired for exercising their first amendment rights.  This is a union publication, if they're not disparaging the product, then the boss shouldn't have anything to say about it, to suggest that they should (recognizing that the original comment wasn't doing this) sets a very dangerous precedent.  

That being said, we should criticize this speech, call it out for the hate speech that it is and let the cop union know that to endorse this kind of speech makes them the enemy of virtue.  


[ Parent ]
Oh I think that there's plenty of precidence to disagree (6.00 / 1)
This is a union publication, if they're not disparaging the product, then the boss shouldn't have anything to say about it, to suggest that they should (recognizing that the original comment wasn't doing this) sets a very dangerous precedent.

Really?  They're public employees who require public trust.  This isn't about free speech at all -- this is about displaying poor judgment about the collection and display of evidence, both skills directly related to their employment.  It's not much different than a cop "winning" the worst shooter in the world competition.


[ Parent ]
Evidence of what though?.... (6.00 / 1)
... A political opinion about patriotism?  Its political propaganda.  Even if he knows it or doesn't, I don't see being a propagandist as being a firing offense.  OTH I do see it as legitimate for coloring anyone's opinion of him, including his superiors.  

"It is not because things are difficult that we do not dare, it is because we do not dare that things are difficult." - Seneca (5 BC - 65 AD)

[ Parent ]
Evidence that the police officer (6.00 / 1)
shows a rather cavalier disregard for the truth and is willing to lie about a citizen publicly and in print.  

Not all propaganda is lies, and some propaganda can be helpful, given that propaganda is a value neutral term.  What this officer did, however, is not value neutral; s/he has lied, in public, about another citizen for political gain.  

I do expect a higher standard from law enforcement who are responsible for the ethical gathering and treatment of facts.   Clearly this individual is not up to the task.


[ Parent ]
Yes (0.00 / 0)
"shows a rather cavalier disregard for the truth and is willing to lie about a citizen publicly and in print. "

Just like I said - he's a propagandist.  I expect him to be professional with the facts when he's on the job.  I think he's allowed to be a loon or a propagandist on his own time.  I don't think its good, but I don't think that it, in and of itself, is a firing offense.  It is, however, probably a warning sign to be on the lookout for other behavior that may well might be actionable.  It shows poor judgment and ethics on his own time.  

"It is not because things are difficult that we do not dare, it is because we do not dare that things are difficult." - Seneca (5 BC - 65 AD)


[ Parent ]
What qualifies as "own time"? (6.00 / 1)
If he were to put that picture somewhere like a political blog or a non-police venue, that would be one thing.  But he didn't.  He put that thing out there in a professional publication that has the imprimatur of the police union on it.  He did it, essentially, then, as a police officer, not as a private citizen.    

So I don't see this as the speech of a private citizen. He spoke in his capacity as a police officer in a law enforcement publication.  


[ Parent ]
The image is the evidence. (6.00 / 1)
The officer inspected the image, and "would not doubt it being authentic," further declaring that "it is not a mirror image."

It's different from the picture of Cheney above precisely because it isn't represented as parody or speech, it's represented as evidence that the Obamas aren't Americans.  It proports to be an actual unaltered photo of the Obamas.

If a cop can be hoodwinked by evidence which is so clearly altered, that cop has terrible skills as an investigator.  If a cop then takes such an obvious forgery and uses it to instigate negative behavior toward someone who is (obviously!) innocent of what the so-called-evidence proclaims, that also demonstrates that the cop has bad judgment.

The cop could demonstrate exactly the same poor judgment if the photo was of Derek Jeter and Alex Rodriguez.  If it was clear that it wasn't intended to be a parody but rather to be convincing, it would show the exact same poor skills in investigating and decision making, and would present exactly the same reasons for termination.


[ Parent ]
No, that's what we have cops, juries, judges, and lawyers for. (6.00 / 2)
Each person in the chain of criminal justice must perform admirably.  Any person in that chain who demonstrates significant lack of judgment and professionalism in an area closely related to their responsibilities as a professional ought to have his or her credentials questioned, because the chain of criminal justice relies on every single link performing well.

The issue isn't that the POTUS isn't an average innocent citizen.  The issue is that the POTUS is a human being in America, and therefore deserves to be treated professionally by the police, just like every other human being in America.


To answer your question about the scientific researcher, the answer is that it depends entirely on the degree of the error.  This error is akin to that researcher submitting an article to a journal showing that the Theory of Gravity is incorrect, proving it by dropping a book and a feather from the same height.  That guy: fired.


[ Parent ]
The other issue (5.00 / 1)
The issue is that the POTUS is a human being in America, and therefore deserves to be treated professionally by the police, just like every other human being in America.

The other issue is that eliminationist rhetoric like this - that the Obama presidency is illegitimate because he's "not really an American" - is really dangerous.  It feeds a paranoid narrative of a "takeover" by Others (much like Lou Dobbs's extraordinarily irresponsible rhetoric about immigrants) and the more that narrative is reinforced, the more unbalanced or weak-willed or desperate people are going to decide they're justified in "resisting" that imagined "takeover" with violent action.

Something there is that doesn't love a wall,
That wants it down.


[ Parent ]
We have met the enemy (0.00 / 0)
Sadly, he is the very person we have hired to protect us

funny (0.00 / 0)
the cops who put the photo in the paper think the exact same thing.

[ Parent ]





I support WWF

Political insider ad network Law blog ad network
Advertise Liberally









Powered by: SoapBlox