Act Blue!
BMG endorses these candidates for election in 2010! Help them win - fill in a donation amount and click "Contribute" to be directed to BMG's Act Blue page.
Deval Patrick (MA-Gov) $
Mac D'Alessandro (MA-09) $
Jim McGovern (MA-03) $
Jack Conway (KY-Sen) $


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?



FREE COPY OF BOB'S BOOK Barack Obama for Beginners to every 100th Facebook Friend!

BMG on Facebook

About
About us
Rules of the road - please read!
Formatting and multimedia tips
Email us
RSS feed

BMG TRAFFIC REPORT
Blue Mass. Swag
Creative Commons License

Event Calendar
September 2010
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* * * 01 02 03 04
05 06 07 08 09 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 * *
<< (add event) >>

Active Users
Currently 8 user(s) logged on.

Search




Advanced Search


Blog Roll
Massachusetts Left
.08 Acres
Below Boston
Berkshires Blog
Blue News Tribune
Chimes at Midnight
Eisenthal Report
Granby 01033
Health Care for All
Left in Lowell
MA lefty blogs
Marry in Mass.
Mass Engagement
Massachusetts Liberal
Michael Forbes-Wilcox
My Dedham
Progressive Mass.
Quriltai on the Shore
Ryan's Take
Someday I Will
ShrewsBuried
Talking Stoneham
The Fray
Universal hub

Differently-Winged
John Daley
Mass. Pro-Life
No Looking Backwards
Peter Porcupine
Pundit Review
Red Mass Group
Scaling the Hill 2010

Mass. Media
David S. Bernstein
Cambridge politics
CommonWealth Unbound
Globe bloggers
Herald bloggers
Hub Blog
Jon Keller
MassBeacon
MA Election 2010
Media Nation (Dan Kennedy)
Open Media Boston
Adam Reilly
Toll Talk (Mary Connaughton)
Weekly Dig Blog
Wicked Local Politics

Legal
ACS Blog
Balkinization
Election law
How Appealing
SCOTUSblog
Volokh Conspiracy

General
Accountable Strategies
Billionaires for Bush
Blue Works Better
Crooks and Liars
Daily Howler
Daily Kos
Democracy Arsenal
Eschaton (Atrios)
Glenn Greenwald
Grist (environment blog)
Hullabaloo (Digby)
LiberalOasis
MyDD
Oliver Willis
Pandagon
Political Animal
Political Critic
Political Wire
Poor Man
Progressive Blog Digest
Real Climate
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Tapped
Talking Points Memo
Think Progress
Truth and Progress
Turn Maine Blue
Wonkette

www.BlueMassGroup.com

Scott Brown Votes Against Unemployment Extension

by: Striker57

Wed Jun 23, 2010 at 08:09:01 AM EDT


(Scott Brown vs. the unemployed. Neo-Hooverism. - promoted by Charley on the MTA)

http://www.boston.com/business...

John Nocella checks the job listings at state career centers almost every day. He's sent out at least 150 resumes. But it has been more than a year of searching since he lost his sales job, and Nocella is about to run out of time.

... "Unless you've been in this position, you don't realize how hard it is,'' said Nocella, 64, of Stoneham. "The bills never disappear. People like me are in a desperate mode. We don't know where we are going to end up."

Sen. Scott Brown explains his vote against unemployment extesnions for Massachusetts residents this way:

"We need to stop the deficit spending and start offsetting the cost of worthy programs by cutting wasteful spending in other places,'' Brown said in a statement. "This requires elected leaders to make hard choices, but our country's economic stability requires that we get our fiscal house in order.''

Unemployment checks go directly back into the Massachusetts economy - paying rent, buying food, spending money in local businesses. And Scott Brown ignores that basic economic fact - voting in lockstep with the Washington DC Republican leadership (and sadly a few DINOs).

November 2012 can't get here soon enough.

Striker57 :: Scott Brown Votes Against Unemployment Extension
Tags: (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

ADVERTISEMENT
10,000 residents a week are losing their unemployment benefits NOW (0.00 / 0)
And most are too young for social security, and do not qualify for food stamps or anything else, yet.

How many will go into foreclosure, be evicted and homeless, etc.?

What is a person who loses their job due to budget cuts, or outsourcing, and is 50, 55, 62 going to do?

Where is the "bailout" for these folks, or even a jobs program to harness their experience and willingness to work without age bias, bias against the "over-qualified", etc?

Deborah Sirotkin Butler
AmberPaw dot @aol.com

"Failure to plan is planning to fail."
Proverb


Too much use of the Globe article (0.00 / 0)
I think a good rule of thumb is to use a paragraph or two of copyrighted material -- enough to get the gist, but not more. I think this post used too much, so I'm going to edit.

---
Blue Mass. Group
Call Scott Brown's office at (617) 565-3170, or (202) 224-4543 to support a cap on carbon emissions: 350ppm by 2050
My Twitter feed


The camouflage position? (6.00 / 1)
Aren't Brown and other Republicans saying something this:
  • The government is spending so much money that "they" are going to have to raise taxes.
  • Raising taxes kills jobs.
  • Worse, the mere threat of future taxes kills jobs.
It sounds pretty absurd. It comes off like a random collection of topically connected talking points.

Maybe, if someone can detect a coherent argument there, we could address it.


They Want Starving Slaves (6.00 / 1)
They want to cut the unemployment benefits so that out of work people will have to work cheap or starve.

The more desperate people there are, the lower the pay will be for everyone.

Forget what Brown or any politician says. Anyone can make a few light pleasantries in a speech.

What matters is what they do and what the result is.

It is all about CHEAP LABOR. That's what right wing economics is about.


Welfare (0.00 / 0)
I don't know how this works, but wouldn't these folks now (at least in many cases) qualify for welfare and/or other assistance benefits?  So by cutting off unemployment benefits - aren't we just pushing them off one plan onto another?  And, are these other benefits state or federally funded?

The welfare program won't help a lot of folks losing UI (6.00 / 3)
Hi RST1231 -

The state's welfare program, called TAFDC, has a number of eligibility restrictions.  For example, you're ineligible if you don't have children under age 18.  You're ineligible if you have a car worth more than $10,000.  You're ineligible if you have assets worth more than $2,500.

And the amount of the monthly grant is very low.  For a family of three, it is around $600 per month.  Compare that to the maximum Unemployment Insurance grant of $654 per week.  

So, welfare will help a few folks who lose UI, but not many.  

(PS - The state program is paid for with both federal and state money.)  


[ Parent ]
wow (0.00 / 0)
Thanks for the info Hester, I knew there were different programs for families and others with small children, but I thought there maybe was something for those without small children.  Sad to know there isn't.

[ Parent ]
There's a small state program (6.00 / 1)
called "Emergency Aid to the Elderly, Disabled and Children (EAEDC)," that provides benefits to some adults without children.  But those adults must be either elderly or disabled, and they can have even fewer assets than the TAFDC program (which is the program usually thought of as  synonymous with "welfare") allows.  Consequently, only about 20,000 people are receiving these benefits.  There is very little overlap between the UI population and the EAEDC population, because the UI program requires that a person be able to work, while the EAEDC program essentially requires the opposite.  The maximum benefit for this program is only $303.

There are also some federal programs for disabled people who don't have kids.    

But for people who are able to work, UI is pretty much it.  


[ Parent ]
Defining vote of what Scott Brown (0.00 / 0)
is or where he stands.   McConnell demanded unity on this and he got it.    

Will we see McConnellvilles like the Hoovervilles of old? (0.00 / 0)
Hoovervilles sprouted during the Great Depression, and were tolerated because people had no where to live.

While tents may work for the summer, not so easy in winter in New England.

Deborah Sirotkin Butler
AmberPaw dot @aol.com

"Failure to plan is planning to fail."
Proverb


[ Parent ]





The 2010 Governor's race, per Pollster.com



I support WWF

Political insider ad network Law blog ad network
Advertise Liberally









Powered by: SoapBlox