Support BMG PAC!
About BMG PAC
Make a secure credit card contribution using Google Checkout:
$
Or send a check to BMG PAC, PO Box 877, Medford, MA 02155.
View BMG PAC's latest disclosure report


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?



FREE COPY OF BOB'S BOOK Barack Obama for Beginners to every 50th Facebook Friend!
BMG on Facebook

About
About us
Rules of the road - please read!
Formatting and multimedia tips
Email us
RSS feed

BMG TRAFFIC REPORT
Blue Mass. Swag
Creative Commons License

Event Calendar
February 2010
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* 01 02 03 04 05 06
07 08 09 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 * * * * * *
<< (add event) >>

Active Users
Currently 26 user(s) logged on.

Search




Advanced Search


Blog Roll
Massachusetts Left
.08 Acres
Below Boston
Berkshires Blog
Blue News Tribune
Chimes at Midnight
Eisenthal Report
Granby 01033
Health Care for All
Left in Lowell
MA lefty blogs
Marry in Mass.
Mass Engagement
Massachusetts Liberal
Michael Forbes-Wilcox
My Dedham
Progressive Mass.
Quriltai on the Shore
Ryan's Take
Someday I Will
ShrewsBuried
Talking Stoneham
The Fray
Universal hub

Differently-Winged
John Daley
Mass. Pro-Life
No Looking Backwards
Peter Porcupine
Pundit Review
Red Mass Group
Scaling the Hill 2010

Mass. Media
David S. Bernstein
Cambridge politics
CommonWealth Unbound
Globe bloggers
Herald bloggers
Hub Blog
Jon Keller
MassBeacon
Media Nation (Dan Kennedy)
Open Media Boston
Adam Reilly
Toll Talk (Mary Connaughton)
Weekly Dig Blog

Legal
ACS Blog
Balkinization
Election law
How Appealing
SCOTUSblog
Volokh Conspiracy

General
Accountable Strategies
Billionaires for Bush
Blue Works Better
Crooks and Liars
Daily Howler
Daily Kos
Democracy Arsenal
Eschaton (Atrios)
Glenn Greenwald
Grist (environment blog)
Hullabaloo (Digby)
LiberalOasis
MyDD
Oliver Willis
Pandagon
Political Animal
Political Critic
Political Wire
Poor Man
Progressive Blog Digest
Real Climate
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Tapped
Talking Points Memo
Think Progress
Truth and Progress
Turn Maine Blue
Wonkette

www.BlueMassGroup.com

AP's Glen Johnson catches Romney lying.

by: Charley on the MTA

Thu Jan 17, 2008 at 21:08:52 PM EST


(Bumped. Follow the link -- the video @ CBS is absolutely must see. - promoted by Charley on the MTA)

The AP's Glen Johnson (formerly of the Globe) had Romney dead-to-rights when, in his slavish, goofy way, he tried to channel John Edwards:

Romney was in the middle of answering a routine question when he said something that caused Associated Press reporter Glen Johnson to lose his temper.

“I don’t have lobbyists running my campaign,” Romney said. “I don’t have lobbyists that are tied to my … ”

“That’s not true, governor!” Johnson suddenly interjected. “That is not true. Ron Kaufman is a lobbyist.” [ed.:  Ron Kaufman is a lobbyist. Not exactly shy about it, either.]

Kaufman is a well-known lobbyist, former adviser to President H.W. Bush and Romney campaign adviser who is often seen by the governor’s side while on the road.

This is hilarious on a number of levels. First is the idea that Mitt would claim to be above lobbyists and corporate control of government. Uh, yeah ... say what you want about the other candidates, but some wear the populist mantle a little better than others. And few wear it worse than a pandering venture capitalist running as the next CEO-in-chief.

And then was his contention that this guy either a.) is not a lobbyist, or b.) is not helping run his campaign (clarification -- he claimed "b"):

So, that statement is, you might say, "non-operational." 

Update: Here's Johnson's sweeet dispatch on the exchange. Does Russert act like this when people lie to his face?

COLUMBIA, S.C. -- Republican Mitt Romney said Thursday he could govern in the country's best interest because "I don't have lobbyists running my campaign," although Washington insiders are on his senior staff and registered lobbyists are top advisers.

Charley on the MTA :: AP's Glen Johnson catches Romney lying.
Tags: (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Are you proposing that only Mitt (0.00 / 0)
is guilty of taking the advice of millions of "handlers" in his lifetime.  Any rise to this level of politics demands hours upon hours of coaching in order to appear "normal" to specified demographic groups.
Hey, K-Street runs govenment no?

Not at all! (6.00 / 1)
Demonstrating true independence of the pernicious influence of money-politics is indeed the hard trick, and I'm not sure any of the viable candidates have done that. However, only Mitt is just straight-up lying about it.

Yes, K-Street runs government. That's the biggest environmental issue; it's the biggest budget issue; it's the biggest energy issue; it's the biggest agricultural issue; it's the biggest health care issue; etc.

---

Blue Mass. Group
So what politics do you deserve?


[ Parent ]
When people lie to Russert's face, he just goes to the next question (5.00 / 1)
That's why Dick Cheney's staffer testified that Meet The Press allowed Cheney the best medium to get his message across to the public.

I love how Fehnstrom (sp?)... (6.00 / 1)
...admonishes Glenn to "be professional" at the end. Here's an idea, Eric and Mitt, how about not being lying frauds. Lying about MLK isn't exactly professional.

I liked the lede from this AP column. It about sums it up:

Mitt Won, Authenticity Lost

WASHINGTON - Mitt Romney's victory in Michigan was a defeat for authenticity in politics.

The former Massachusetts governor pandered to voters, distorted his opponents' record and continued to show why he's the most malleable - and least credible - major presidential candidate.

And it worked.



Let me get this straight: Democrats protest war, Republicans protest health care?

Kind of ominous (0.00 / 0)
that Fehrnstrom might be right about "professionalism" in the press corps.  Why doesn't this happen more often?  Because the press thinks it isn't professional to say "that's not true!" and confront the speaker on the issue.  They are just supposed to be observers and report about any lies they heard later.  The people who shout confrontational things to the candidates are by their definition kooks, about whom they professionally agree with the candidates should not be part of the story.  So he crossed into protecting the process from kooks into being a kook.  As a kook myself, I hope we see a lot more unprofessionalism from those bastards.

[ Parent ]
I don't know a Steering Committee from my political elbow... (6.00 / 2)
...but this nugget pertains to the subject at hand:

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE                
June 18, 2007
CONTACT: Romney Press Shop

Boston, MA - Today, Governor Mitt Romney announced the Romney for President Massachusetts Steering Committee.  Led by statewide chairs former Lt. Governor Kerry Healey, The Honorable Jody Dow and The Honorable Ron Kaufman, this group of Massachusetts Republicans will help build Governor Romney's already strong grassroots support in the state.



Let me get this straight: Democrats protest war, Republicans protest health care?

Pooh. (0.00 / 0)
A steering committee like that is a laundry list of supporters - and making the National Committee Man and the National Committee Woman the leads is routine (if you GOT them...).

Hell, I think I may be on it!

Yr. Obedient Servant, Peter Porcupine, Republican


[ Parent ]
All I'm saying is that its a dot, albeit small, that... (0.00 / 0)
...documents Mitt's connections to lobbyists.  

Let me get this straight: Democrats protest war, Republicans protest health care?

[ Parent ]
Mitt chose his words way too carefully (0.00 / 0)
Apparently, not being paid means he is not "tied to" the campaign.  Perhaps it is some legal term, some part of campaign finance law or something.  He parsed "running" for us on the spot, explaining that only his chairperson is "running the campaign", now he needs to explain what being tied to means.

[ Parent ]
"Being argumentative with the candidate" (6.00 / 1)
Is unprofessional, according to Eric Fehrnstrom. So much for our system of freedom of the press and the importance of questioning government officials. I guess the founders of the country who approved the 1st Amendment had it all wrong. What the Fehrnstrom Amendment would have said was:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech or of the press, unless the press is, "argumentative," with political candidates;; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Was Willard's assistant wearing jackboots? I couldn't tell from the video.

BMG: Reality-based commentary.


fake jackboots (0.00 / 0)
because willard and co. are into playing dress-up.  
http://www.bostonherald.com/ne...
guess the rolls are going to their heads.

Click HERE and sign up: Campaign For Military Partners.

[ Parent ]



I support WWF


Political insider ad network Law blog ad network
Advertise Liberally









Powered by: SoapBlox