Support BMG PAC!
About BMG PAC
Make a secure credit card contribution using Google Checkout:
$
Or send a check to BMG PAC, PO Box 877, Medford, MA 02155.
View BMG PAC's latest disclosure report


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?



FREE COPY OF BOB'S BOOK Barack Obama for Beginners to every 50th Facebook Friend!
BMG on Facebook

About
About us
Rules of the road - please read!
Formatting and multimedia tips
Email us
RSS feed

BMG TRAFFIC REPORT
Blue Mass. Swag
Creative Commons License

Event Calendar
February 2010
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* 01 02 03 04 05 06
07 08 09 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 * * * * * *
<< (add event) >>

Active Users
Currently 23 user(s) logged on.

Search




Advanced Search


Blog Roll
Massachusetts Left
.08 Acres
Below Boston
Berkshires Blog
Blue News Tribune
Chimes at Midnight
Eisenthal Report
Granby 01033
Health Care for All
Left in Lowell
MA lefty blogs
Marry in Mass.
Mass Engagement
Massachusetts Liberal
Michael Forbes-Wilcox
My Dedham
Progressive Mass.
Quriltai on the Shore
Ryan's Take
Someday I Will
ShrewsBuried
Talking Stoneham
The Fray
Universal hub

Differently-Winged
John Daley
Mass. Pro-Life
No Looking Backwards
Peter Porcupine
Pundit Review
Red Mass Group
Scaling the Hill 2010

Mass. Media
David S. Bernstein
Cambridge politics
CommonWealth Unbound
Globe bloggers
Herald bloggers
Hub Blog
Jon Keller
MassBeacon
Media Nation (Dan Kennedy)
Open Media Boston
Adam Reilly
Toll Talk (Mary Connaughton)
Weekly Dig Blog

Legal
ACS Blog
Balkinization
Election law
How Appealing
SCOTUSblog
Volokh Conspiracy

General
Accountable Strategies
Billionaires for Bush
Blue Works Better
Crooks and Liars
Daily Howler
Daily Kos
Democracy Arsenal
Eschaton (Atrios)
Glenn Greenwald
Grist (environment blog)
Hullabaloo (Digby)
LiberalOasis
MyDD
Oliver Willis
Pandagon
Political Animal
Political Critic
Political Wire
Poor Man
Progressive Blog Digest
Real Climate
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Tapped
Talking Points Memo
Think Progress
Truth and Progress
Turn Maine Blue
Wonkette

www.BlueMassGroup.com

Deval Patrick steps up on Ameriquest

by: David

Fri Jan 27, 2006 at 12:03:01 PM EST


Three cheers for Deval Patrick for doing the right thing on Ameriquest.  If you're on his mailing list you've probably already seen this, but just in case, here is Patrick's just-released statement on the Ameriquest settlement and his role in it:

I also want to let you know about an important issue. A few days ago, Ameriquest Mortgage Company and the attorneys general of 49 states announced a settlement of serious unfair lending claims. I had a central role in getting this result.

The settlement is very good news for consumers throughout the country. In the words of Tom Miller of Iowa , the lead Attorney General on the negotiating team, "This is a landmark agreement that will change Ameriquest's practices, and it will set standards we expect other mortgage lenders to follow." Massachusetts Banking Commissioner Steven L. Antonakes declared that the settlement "will result in even greater protections for consumers."

That's true. The agreement raises the bar for lending practices across the industry. That is a very good thing, because sub-prime lending is the fastest growing sector of the lending market. They lend to the people the big banks won't touch.

I am proud to have been a part of the solution. I joined the board of ACC Capital Holdings, the parent company of Ameriquest, in mid-2004, after the attorneys general investigations were already underway. I was asked to join largely because of those investigations.

I am no newcomer to fair lending enforcement. My involvement in these issues goes back to leading the charge against predatory lending in Massachusetts more than a decade ago on behalf of elderly Black borrowers. In the Justice Department I led the most far-reaching fair lending enforcement program in American history. In fact, when I was there we took on the predecessor company of Ameriquest itself. I know what rigorous oversight and enlightened practices can do to put the dream of homeownership within reach of more people.

I brought that experience and commitment to the Board of ACC Capital Holdings. I serve as the Board's point person for the company's ongoing efforts to improve its oversight and internal controls. I was briefed by the negotiating team regularly, and helped guide the company to an effective and practical result. This week's settlement makes Ameriquest -- and the entire industry -- better.

Sometimes, to solve a problem, you have to be willing to get your hands dirty, to get into how and why a problem arises as a path to getting to the best solution. I was taught that getting involved is a more effective way to fix a problem than standing on the sidelines. When you choose me as Governor, you ought to know you are getting a leader who is ready to roll up his sleeves.

This is exactly the kind of statement I've been hoping Patrick would issue.  He tells us why he joined the board of Ameriquest's parent company.  He tells us why it's a good thing that sub-prime lenders exist, as long as they play fair.  He tells us about his long, honorable history of working to ensure that all Americans have the dream of home ownership within their reach.  And he tells us why he's proud of what he accomplished in this matter.  Good for him.

David :: Deval Patrick steps up on Ameriquest
Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Perfect! (0.00 / 0)
I think that this statement is excellent!  It addresses all the concerns someone may have including the why.  He admits joining with full knowledge of the situation Ameriquest was in but doing so because he had the expertise to lend a hand.  I am very impressed.

A blogger no more.

Ameriquest (0.00 / 0)
Both Deval Patrick and Tom Reilly have some work to do on the Ameriquest issue.  They both need to step out and endorse a bill filed by Senator Barrios and Representative St. Fleur that would create community reinvestment type responsibilities here in Massachusetts for mortgage companies like Ameriquest.  Settlements like the one announced this week are okay, but they won't change behavior unless state law catches up with who is doing the bulk of the mortgage lending these days.  The Homeownership Investment Act would clean up this type of "despicable" behavior (Reilly's word). 

tell us about the bill? (0.00 / 0)
Can you tell us more about this Barrios/St. Fleur legislation?  What would it do, how would it work?

[ Parent ]
Homeownership Investment Act (4.00 / 1)
Sure.

The “Homeownership Investment Actâ€� (S#562/H#3011) would require licensed mortgage lenders making more than 50 loans per year in Massachusetts to responsibly meet the housing credit needs of low to moderate income residents and neighborhoods.  Current state law covers banks and credit unions for community reinvestment but not mortgage companies.  Mortgage companies would be examined by state regulators every few years and given a public rating based on how well they were serving low and moderate income communities in Massachusetts.  Most importantly, it would give elected officials and community groups a seat at the table when trying to negotiate better lending practices with mortgage companies.  Eight of the top ten subprime lenders (including Ameriquest) in Massachusetts would be covered by this bill.

A similar bill passed the Senate in 2002 on a 38-0 roll call vote.  It has never come up for a vote in the House.  Mayors Menino and Cohen, the Massachusetts Bankers Association, and the Massachusetts Community and Banking Council support the bill.  The Boston Globe, New Bedford Standard-Times, and the Dorchester Reporter have endorsed the bill.  The chief non-profit sponsor of the bill is the Massachusetts Affordable Housing Alliance.

If this bill were in effect, 120 lenders would be covered, including lenders such as H&R Block, GMAC, Countrywide, Ameriquest, and Household Finance.  These lenders accounted for approximately 40% of all mortgage lending in Massachusetts in 2004. 

Massachusetts is one of the few states in the country that has community reinvestment-type laws for banks, credit unions, and insurance companies.  With some leadership from Tom Reilly and Deval Patrick, we could again lead the way on this issue.


[ Parent ]
This sounds similar to... (0.00 / 0)
what big banks have to do under federal law.  There must be a certain amount going back to the community or some amount of high risk loans a bank has to take on.

A blogger no more.

[ Parent ]
Not satisfied (0.00 / 0)
Maybe I'm missing something but Patrick still hasn't answered everyone's questions. In fact he avoids the most important ones in his email. Ameriquest pays him with the same money that they now admit they made by ripping people off. This is just a typical politician who is just trying to take undeserved credit for something. I think Woodlief from the Herald got it right and everyone should read this article.

Ameriquest case lends AG credibility
By Wayne Woodlief
Boston Herald Columnist

Thursday, January 26, 2006

The way Tom Reilly and Deval Patrick have handled the predatory lending lawsuit case against Ameriquest Mortgage Co. shows the contrasting styles the Democratic rivals for governor would bring to the Corner Office.

  Attorney General Reilly is a passionate moralist, quick to righteously go after the black hats with all his might. Take it from Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller, the lead lawyer in the $325 million national settlement that includes $12 million for Massachusetts homeowners gulled into bigger loans and huge fees.

  “His great strength is when something is wrong, he recognizes it and wants to right the wrong,â€� Miller said. Indeed, Reilly and New York Attorney General Elliot Spitzer balked when Ameriquest tried to stand firm on a $285 million settlement. A Reilly aide said, “Ameriquest [reps] were on the red eyeâ€� to the East Coast that night to jack it up another $40 million in meetings with Reilly and Spitzer.

  “This is a bad company, a bad company,â€� Reilly said this week — a good week for the AG as he triumphantly kicked off his gubernatorial campaign with a roots-style rally in his Springfield hometown, and a hard jab at Patrick as I interviewed him by phone.

  I asked if Patrick should resign from Ameriquest’s board and Reilly replied, “That’s his decision. But this company cheated a lot of middle-class people out of their most precious possession — the equity in their homes. It’s not a company whose payroll I’d be on.â€�

  But Patrick — who tilted against predatory lending as head of the Justice Department’s civil rights section under President Clinton — said he’s not about to resign. Especially now, since “the real issue is the implementation of the very good agreement.â€�

  “I was appointed as a member of the board because of this case, by the guy [former board chairman Roland Arnall] that I’d investigated in an earlier suit. When I was in the Justice Department we developed the most far-reaching fair-lending enforcement program ever . . . Roland wanted me to help make this case a platform for change.â€�

  Patrick is smooth, as familiar with boardrooms as Reilly is with courtrooms. Like Reilly, he had a hard-scrabble upbringing. But unlike the AG, he doesn’t pound on those doors of privilege so much as pry them open.

  Patrick said Reilly’s labeling of Ameriquest was “just political hyperbole. In fact, these institutions lend to people the downtown banks wouldn’t touch.â€� His approach: “Sometimes you have to get your hands dirty, get into something, understand how it works and why a problem arises. That’s what leaders ought to do. Not sit on the sidelines and criticize.â€�

  Does he mean Reilly is hot-dogging it from the sidelines?

  “Yes,â€� Patrick answered.

  Well Reilly may hot-dog occasionally. But not on this one. Reilly and the other AGs also insisted on an independent monitor to oversee Ameriquest’s enforcement of its standards in the future — the same “first-class standardsâ€� that Patrick said he’ll work for as a board member.

  That would be an ideal way for him to earn his salary on the board. He would not reveal what he is paid but when pressed to put it in financial disclosure form terms said, “It’s over $100,000.â€� How much over, he didn’t say.

  The Reilly and Patrick styles also contrast on the main issue that divides them: The proposed state income tax rollback to a flat 5 percent. For Reilly, it’s a simple moral question: “We have to honor the voice of the people.â€� Patrick says he’s for a rollback — but not just yet. Meanwhile, he vows to work from the inside with the Massachusetts Municipal Association to help create more local option taxes.

  Hey, with Reilly banging on all these doors and Patrick working for more gradual relief, I’m getting a bit confused. Just which of them is the insider and which the outsider?
 


Ooookay... (0.00 / 0)
"Ameriquest pays him with the same money that they now admit they made by ripping people off."

Um, what other sort of money would they be paying him? It has to come from their parent company in order for him to be working for the board (and it's still not clear as I recall if or how much he's paid anyway).

Patrick says he joined AFTER the lawsuit, because he wanted to make a case for change...what exactly are you objecting to here?

And you really should figure out a way to make your "copy and paste" seperate from your commentary...like using "####" before and after. And a link would be nice too.

Left in Lowell: cuz why read the Lowell Sun if you don't have to? ;)


[ Parent ]
He told Woodlief (0.00 / 0)
that it was over $100,000.  Not chump change.  He ought to donate all of the Ameriquest money to some housing-related worthy cause - that would defuse that part of the issue once and for all.

[ Parent ]
Over a $100,000 but less than...$1 Billion (0.00 / 0)
What kind of answer is "over $100,000"?  Apparently Ameriquest is not a public company (at least I could not find it) so we may never know.

If Patrick does reach the mantle of viablity, he does have to clear up the quesions about his personal wealth.  Does he currently have a $2 million dollar contract with Coke (which may have a non disclosure preventing him or Coke to confirm it)  Does he have 22 million stock options from Texaco?  Does he have the kind of money in which he can match the emerging field.  (In January of '05, I heard him tell a crowd that he does not and the stock option #, first reported in the Washington Post, was flat out wrong).


[ Parent ]



I support WWF


Political insider ad network Law blog ad network
Advertise Liberally









Powered by: SoapBlox