Support BMG PAC!
About BMG PAC
Make a secure credit card contribution using Google Checkout:
$
Or send a check to BMG PAC, PO Box 877, Medford, MA 02155.
View BMG PAC's latest disclosure report


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?



FREE COPY OF BOB'S BOOK Barack Obama for Beginners to every 50th Facebook Friend!
BMG on Facebook

About
About us
Rules of the road - please read!
Formatting and multimedia tips
Email us
RSS feed

BMG TRAFFIC REPORT
Blue Mass. Swag
Creative Commons License

Event Calendar
February 2010
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* 01 02 03 04 05 06
07 08 09 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 * * * * * *
<< (add event) >>

Active Users
Currently 34 user(s) logged on.

Search




Advanced Search


Blog Roll
Massachusetts Left
.08 Acres
Below Boston
Berkshires Blog
Blue News Tribune
Chimes at Midnight
Eisenthal Report
Granby 01033
Health Care for All
Left in Lowell
MA lefty blogs
Marry in Mass.
Mass Engagement
Massachusetts Liberal
Michael Forbes-Wilcox
My Dedham
Progressive Mass.
Quriltai on the Shore
Ryan's Take
Someday I Will
ShrewsBuried
Talking Stoneham
The Fray
Universal hub

Differently-Winged
John Daley
Mass. Pro-Life
No Looking Backwards
Peter Porcupine
Pundit Review
Red Mass Group
Scaling the Hill 2010

Mass. Media
David S. Bernstein
Cambridge politics
CommonWealth Unbound
Globe bloggers
Herald bloggers
Hub Blog
Jon Keller
MassBeacon
Media Nation (Dan Kennedy)
Open Media Boston
Adam Reilly
Toll Talk (Mary Connaughton)
Weekly Dig Blog

Legal
ACS Blog
Balkinization
Election law
How Appealing
SCOTUSblog
Volokh Conspiracy

General
Accountable Strategies
Billionaires for Bush
Blue Works Better
Crooks and Liars
Daily Howler
Daily Kos
Democracy Arsenal
Eschaton (Atrios)
Glenn Greenwald
Grist (environment blog)
Hullabaloo (Digby)
LiberalOasis
MyDD
Oliver Willis
Pandagon
Political Animal
Political Critic
Political Wire
Poor Man
Progressive Blog Digest
Real Climate
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Tapped
Talking Points Memo
Think Progress
Truth and Progress
Turn Maine Blue
Wonkette

www.BlueMassGroup.com

Arrogance

by: David

Wed Feb 01, 2006 at 11:06:07 AM EST


What idiots Tom Reilly, Marie St. Fleur, and their campaign staffers must think we all are.

As everyone knows by now, it turns out that Marie St. Fleur - Tom Reilly's hand-picked Lieutenant Governor candidate - has massive money problems, including an extant $12,000 federal tax lien from less than a year ago, along with over $7,000 of now-discharged city tax liens from a couple of years ago, and over $40,000 of delinquent student loans dating back to her graduation from BC Law School in 1987.

It's hard for me to decide what I find most infuriating about this story.  Here are a couple of options:

  • Tom Reilly admitting that St. Fleur warned him that she had "some financial issues," but that "he didn't ask her to provide any numbers and only sought assurance from her that she was dealing with the problems."  Well, gosh, Tom, did it occur to you that someone else - the Globe, for example - might provide the numbers for you?  And that the numbers might be pretty ugly - as, in fact, they are?  Like I said before, Reilly's campaign staff surely wants to forget the month of January, which featured several major screw-ups.  February's not looking so hot for them either, so far.

  • St. Fleur declaring that "most people will understand her problems, because they are so common: She and her husband have struggled to make ends meet on modest incomes while raising three children."  You know what?  I don't buy it.  St. Fleur has been a state legislator since 1999.  At present, the base salary for state legislators is over $55,000 (plus health insurance and other benefits), and St. Fleur, as vice-chair of the House Ways & Means Committee, undoubtedly makes several thousand dollars more than that - plus, at least in 2003, she reported several thousand dollars of outside income from a law firm.  So her own income is approaching $70,000, plus whatever her husband makes.  It's not a princely sum, but neither does it approach trying to raise a family on minimum wage or other low-paying jobs that don't carry generous taxpayer-funded benefits.  Yet thousands of people do just that without having the IRS and the city file liens for delinquent taxes.  Apparently, she didn't even know what the situation with the IRS lien was before talking to the press:

    St. Fleur told the Globe last night that she had paid down the federal tax debt to about $8,000 by making $500 monthly payments since last spring. But later last night, Corey Welford, a Reilly campaign spokesman, corrected her, saying that she had in fact made only one $500 payment last May and that the balance is still more than $12,000.

    And her husband is an accountant, for heaven's sake!  Maybe I'm being harsh, but I seriously question whether "most people will understand" this kind of thing.  To the contrary, I think "most people" expect state legislators who earn a nice living at least to keep up with their taxes.  Dianne Wilkerson's similar (though more serious in some ways) problems have been a major albatross around her neck ever since they came to light some years ago, and Wilkerson never ran for statewide office.

  • And speaking of Wilkerson, how much does it really help the cause of racial justice to thrust into the limelight yet another female legislator of color with major financial problems?

  • Meanwhile, the fallout to the party, while probably not yet on the public's radar screen, appears to be significant.  The Globe reports that some mayors and local officials who were committed to Reilly have now dumped him because they're pissed about Reilly's double-crossing of Lt. Gov. candidate Tim Murray; others are sticking with Reilly but will not support St. Fleur.  Meanwhile, Deb Goldberg - previously endorsed for Lt. Gov. by St. Fleur - apparently hasn't yet spoken with either of them, leading to the following droll comment to Herald columnist Margery Eagan:

    All this prompted one Republican to offer a slogan for Reilly's campaign: "We Broke Our Word to Our Best Supporters. Think What We'll Do For You!"

    What a godawful mess.

  • It all boils down to arrogance.  Tom Reilly arrogantly decides that he doesn't need to know the extent of St. Fleur's financial problems, assuming that if her assurances are good enough for him, they'll be good enough for the people of Massachusetts.  St. Fleur arrogantly decides that "most people will understand" her financial problems, even though she's financially much better off than most of those "people" whose understanding she assumes she will have.  They both arrogantly decide that whatever commitments they made to already-announced Lieutenant Governor candidates don't matter, apparently expecting that the rest of the party will just fall in line behind them because they're the alleged "front-runners" (I wonder how long this "front-runner" idea will hold up).

    I don't know whether this will lead to a sudden surge of local elected officials bailing on Reilly and signing on with Patrick.  But what I do suspect is that this - along with the campaign's other miscues - will substantially dampen the enthusiasm of the local officials and the rest of the party apparatus for Reilly's campaign.  And we all know what happened to Scott Harshbarger when the party apparatus wasn't solidly behind him.

    You've just got to think that Deval Patrick has been feeling pretty good these last few days.  From Eagan's Herald column:

    Asked what above-the-fray Deval thinks of all this, his spokesman kept above the fray.  "We continue to do what we do ... he (Reilly) continues to do what he does."  How deliciously Zen. But then it's easier to be calm when you've suddenly got the mo', no?
    David :: Arrogance
    Tags: , , , (All Tags)
    Print Friendly View Send As Email
    Arrogance | 13 comments
    Let me add this (0.00 / 0)
    If all of these miscues don't dampen the party's enthusiasm for Reilly then we really have problem.  I am not saying Reilly should be abandoned but if politicos don't think the Reilly campaign has serious problems then we lose another 4 years to the Republicans!

    A blogger no more.

    2 things to watch (0.00 / 0)
    First, The Reilly/ St Fleur match is going to make things very difficult for al elected Dems in central MA.

    If they support the "establishment" ticket of Reilly/St. Fleur, then they are making enemies with Murrary and the Worcester machine.

    If they support Murrary, then they are going to cause bad blood with Reilly and the establishment. 

    I am sure this is causing a similar situation in Brookline, although on a much smaller level.

    Yet I am wondering, can you be on both sides of the fence without looking silly.

    I found the Glodis comments in the Globe interesting ( he is supporting Reilly, but not St. Fleur ).  I think we need to get a count from all the Reps/Senators/ DA candidates/ local officials to see where they stand.

    My second concern is regarding the "Front Runner" label.  I think we can officially put that away.  Reilly has been running for Governor since 2003, something changed in the last few weeks ( I don't think it is the Conte call), since he was scrambling to get Gaberlli and then St Fleur).  He couldn't have done this LT Gov work 3 months ago?

    We need polling and we need it now.  The only numbers I have seen show both Reilly and Patrick beating Healey. 

    Where is the Reilly vs. Patrick poll?


    Polling (0.00 / 0)
    Would it make sense to hold off on polling for just a little while yet? Many people may not have made up their mind about St. Fleur, outside of the political junkie circuit. Again, I'm not sure.

    I was unclear (0.00 / 0)
    I am not realy concerned with St. Fleur and her polling, since a poll right now wouldn't be accurate.  Clearly she would get low marks from the financial information and she has not had a chance to show her strenghts ( of which there are many).

    I want to know Reilly's numbers. 

    Are his unfavorables way too high?  Is he losing to Patrick?

    Either way, he is making moves reflective of a desperate candidate.  Otherwise he would have planned this LT Gov thing much differently.  ( going back to my point that Reilly has been running for 3 years now)


    [ Parent ]
    All polling I have seen (0.00 / 0)
    Granted, most of the polling I've paid attention to is months old by now, but all of it shows two things: Reilly cleans Patrick's clock in a head-to-head primary.  Reilly's favorables are high, and his unfavorables are much lower than Romney's (as a reference point).

    That was all before 2006, though.  It's been one train wreck for Reilly after another since New Year's Day.

    .08 Acres
    .0000016% of Massachusetts Political Commentary


    [ Parent ]
    I'm guessing (0.00 / 0)
    that Reilly's unfavorables would be substantially higher than they were in '05.  As you say, '06 hasn't been kind to him so far.

    [ Parent ]
    Reilly / Patrick Polls (0.00 / 0)
    The poll I saw about a week ago on Kos were both Dems against Healey:

    Deval was 51/43 over her and Reilly was something like 49/44 over her.

    The poll frankly surprised me - (disclaimer - I am a Deval guy)

    I will try to find it on Kos and get back here...

    Wayne


    [ Parent ]
    Zogby (0.00 / 0)
    It was a Zogby internet poll.  I had the numbers if you're interested.  The methodology is pretty suspect.  The surveyed population consists, roughly, of people who volunteered to have Zogby send them poll questions.  Then, as I understand it, he then runs the responses through various algorithms, weights them for certain demographics and gets the results that way.

    So, yeah, it's a poll.  In the same way that those Kraft singles are cheese.

    .08 Acres
    .0000016% of Massachusetts Political Commentary


    [ Parent ]
    Wow... (0.00 / 0)
    There seem to be a few posters who get all hot and bothered when they start attacking the Reilly campaign. I think that they might want to take a cold shower and think about how exciting it could be to have some diversity in the race. Sure it doesn't look that great when your husband works with numbers for a living and you can't seem to pay your bills on time, but even political candidates are human...and humans make mistakes! I will wait a little more than a couple days to cast my judgment on this candidate...she might turn out to be just what the Reilly team needs. 

    "how exciting it could be to have some diversity in the race." (0.00 / 0)
    Well, we already had two Jewish women and one black man in the race before St. Fleur parachuted in.  Plus, it's not like St. Fleur just made one mistake.  The Globe documents an extensive history of serious financial difficulties.  I'm not saying that makes her a bad person - obviously it does not.  Nor am I "judging" this candidate.  But the points in my post stand - the way this thing has been handled reflects tremendous arrogance on Reilly's and St. Fleur's parts.

    [ Parent ]
    It will be a liability (0.00 / 0)
    St. Fleur's financial situation *will* be a political liability if she even makes it to the general election. I'm not saying that it *should* be, but given the state of politics today there's no way that the press/opposition -- Republican or independent -- won't try to capitalize.

    The question, I guess, is whether St. Fleur's strengths outweigh her liabilities -- and if the Dems want to take that chance. Personally I would not.


    [ Parent ]
    Hmm (0.00 / 0)
    Reilly has a lot of integrity as a candidate. That's a big strength of his. Combine the whole calling the Worcester DA incident with this revelation about St. Fleur now, and I'd be worried he might lose a little glean off that shine. Because it's not the specificity of either of these issues that will stick, but it's the constant negative mentioning in the media. Eventually, people may start having questions about him since they keep hearing about all these different problems.

    Repayments (0.00 / 0)
    Maybe Rep St Fleur was confused with the $5000.00 she repaid her campaign back for the down payment on her personal automobile. Perhaps she was overwhelmed and thought that money was for the IRS. The big picture is how a candidate for governor could rush into a decision as important as this without having the facts. Just what Massachusetts needs is a governor that is reactive not proactive. Arrogance doesnt even describe this one.

    Arrogance | 13 comments



    I support WWF


    Political insider ad network Law blog ad network
    Advertise Liberally









    Powered by: SoapBlox