Support BMG PAC!
About BMG PAC
Make a secure credit card contribution using Google Checkout:
$
Or send a check to BMG PAC, PO Box 877, Medford, MA 02155.
View BMG PAC's latest disclosure report


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?



FREE COPY OF BOB'S BOOK Barack Obama for Beginners to every 50th Facebook Friend!
BMG on Facebook

About
About us
Rules of the road - please read!
Formatting and multimedia tips
Email us
RSS feed

BMG TRAFFIC REPORT
Blue Mass. Swag
Creative Commons License

Event Calendar
February 2010
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* 01 02 03 04 05 06
07 08 09 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 * * * * * *
<< (add event) >>

Active Users
Currently 21 user(s) logged on.

Search




Advanced Search


Blog Roll
Massachusetts Left
.08 Acres
Below Boston
Berkshires Blog
Blue News Tribune
Chimes at Midnight
Eisenthal Report
Granby 01033
Health Care for All
Left in Lowell
MA lefty blogs
Marry in Mass.
Mass Engagement
Massachusetts Liberal
Michael Forbes-Wilcox
My Dedham
Progressive Mass.
Quriltai on the Shore
Ryan's Take
Someday I Will
ShrewsBuried
Talking Stoneham
The Fray
Universal hub

Differently-Winged
John Daley
Mass. Pro-Life
No Looking Backwards
Peter Porcupine
Pundit Review
Red Mass Group
Scaling the Hill 2010

Mass. Media
David S. Bernstein
Cambridge politics
CommonWealth Unbound
Globe bloggers
Herald bloggers
Hub Blog
Jon Keller
MassBeacon
Media Nation (Dan Kennedy)
Open Media Boston
Adam Reilly
Toll Talk (Mary Connaughton)
Weekly Dig Blog

Legal
ACS Blog
Balkinization
Election law
How Appealing
SCOTUSblog
Volokh Conspiracy

General
Accountable Strategies
Billionaires for Bush
Blue Works Better
Crooks and Liars
Daily Howler
Daily Kos
Democracy Arsenal
Eschaton (Atrios)
Glenn Greenwald
Grist (environment blog)
Hullabaloo (Digby)
LiberalOasis
MyDD
Oliver Willis
Pandagon
Political Animal
Political Critic
Political Wire
Poor Man
Progressive Blog Digest
Real Climate
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Tapped
Talking Points Memo
Think Progress
Truth and Progress
Turn Maine Blue
Wonkette

www.BlueMassGroup.com

2009 Democratic Platform: Seeking Your Input

by: Jamie Eldridge

Fri Feb 13, 2009 at 10:48:56 AM EST


(An excellent plan! - promoted by David)

As previous posters have noted, the Massachusetts Democratic Party is in the process of drafting the 2009 Platform, and is looking to make that process as inclusive and transparent as possible. As the co-chair of the Public Policy Committee for the Democratic Party, I'm interested in hearing from as many people as possible about the Democratic values you think our platform should reflect and what specific policies it should prioritize.

I want to encourage anyone who is interested in this process to attend a Platform hearing - or better yet, host your own. More information is available on the Massachusetts Democratic Party website about how to do this.  

However, I know not everyone will have the opportunity to host or attend a Platform hearing - and we want to encourage dialogue in as many forums as possible, including online.

In that vein, I will be holding 10 "online forums" on BlueMassGroup over the next seven weeks to give people the opportunity to make their voice heard. Each forum will focus in on a specific topic (and I ask you to, as much as possible, restrict your comments to that specific topic!) At the end, we'll hold a "catch-all" forum to capture any topics you think we missed.

(More after the jump!)

Jamie Eldridge :: 2009 Democratic Platform: Seeking Your Input
Typical BMG rules of the road apply - we're hoping to generate civil, substantive discussion about these issues.

For each of these categories, the overall arching questions are: As it pertains to this category, what are our core values as Democrats, and what policies do we think should be included in our 2009 Democratic Platform?

Here is a list of the topics of each of the online forums, as well as the day we'll put up that post. Today starts with Health Care, which I'll put up in a separate post later today.

Topics and Schedule
Health Care - 2/13
Elections & Ethics Reform - 2/17
Education - 2/23
Civil Rights & Civil Liberties - 2/26
Economic Growth, Jobs, and Worker's Rights - 3/3
Economic Justice/Poverty - 3/6
Housing 3/10
Environment 3/13
Public Safety & Criminal Justice 3/18
Misc - What Are We Missing? 3/23

I look forward to hearing your thoughts & ideas!

Tags: , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Across all elements of the platform... (5.50 / 2)
I'd suggest that the number one value should be emphasis upon continuous improvement in government efficiency, productivity, and accountability.

I'd go for one out of three (5.33 / 3)
Look, this idea that there's ever been a time when people weren't demanding efficiency and productivity is a little silly.  There's a group of people who always believe that government can be easily made more efficient (without loss of productivity)... they'll never be satisfied.  The fact is that government at all levels has been searching for efficiencies well, for ever.

Now, I agree that it isn't perfect; no organization of this size ever is.  The point, though, is that many common gripes, while relevant, don't add up to much money.  Even the MBTA early retirement program (23 years and full pension) doesn't add up to very much of the MBTA overall budget.  So I'm not arguing that we shouldn't always be looking to gain efficiencies -- we should.  I am arguing, however, that we all agree on this and it's a "no-brainer" for which there's always pressure, and therefore it's not on the same level of import in this context as housing, enviro, elections, health, etc. -- issues on which the party rank and file have very different ideas on scope, extent, direction, etc.


Accountability -- and I'd add transparency -- are different.  That's something that we as a society don't always harp on and something that our legislators do need constant prodding to work on.  That's something I do think the state Dem platform ought to make sure it includes, if only to remind our Speakah that we expect good behavior.


[ Parent ]
It's no more "silly" than any other item in the Platform (0.00 / 0)
Of course the electorate has very high expectations. Unfortunatly, all too often these expectations aren't articulated or given much priority by elected representatives, party leadership, management, or unions.

Given these difficult economic circumstances we're all under, I feel it's important (and yes largely symbolic) to be very clear that goverernment, like industry must do better.


[ Parent ]
I don't think it's silly at all... (0.00 / 0)
I would say the problem is we don't demand it loudly enough!
The way I see it, inefficiency and lack of productivity and accountability are raging issues in government that are ALWAYS put on the back burner to address more important issues. I agree this value should be front and center in the platform. Doing this will bring to our party the people who don't normally vote, because they don't believe in or trust our government.  It would be a huge tool when out there talking up our party.

[ Parent ]
Missing: Transportation and community development issues (6.00 / 1)
Thanks for your interest in public input. Hope to be able to come back for the "everything else" session next month. But meanwhile, I'd like to pitch two issues important to me:

* Creating  livable, walkable communities

* Transportation policies that don't always actively encourage automobile transportation to the exclusion of all other modes of transit

Yes, I understand that most people aren't going to ditch their autos for mass transportation, especially outside of urban areas. But is it really necessary to design state roadways that are so hostile to pedestrians that people need to take their cars - even when the weather is nice - to travel less than half a mile from, say, their office to a bank or store? (I'm told the Commonwealth is responsible for the pedestrian crossings along Rte. 30).

I'm also intensely concerned at the gross inequity of charging tolls on one roadway to pay for the construction project of a completely different roadway in a city that's 20 miles away, while most actual users of that new roadway don't pay tolls. If tolls are supposed to pay for the Big Dig, then charge tolls on that stretch of highway. Hiking tolls for people who drive between Framingham and Newton in order to improve the commutes of people driving free from Quincy to Boston is unacceptable. I'm still unclear why people on the Turnpike are paying tolls long after the Turnpike bonds were retired, while all our other highways (excluding bridges and tunnels) are paid for out of taxes.



Realistically? Truthfully? (0.00 / 0)
Calculate end of unemployment benefits.
Sell House
Buy farm in NH
Buy a gun
Very simple and uncomplicated.




I support WWF


Political insider ad network Law blog ad network
Advertise Liberally









Powered by: SoapBlox