Support BMG PAC!
About BMG PAC
Make a secure credit card contribution using Google Checkout:
$
Or send a check to BMG PAC, PO Box 877, Medford, MA 02155.
View BMG PAC's latest disclosure report


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?



FREE COPY OF BOB'S BOOK Barack Obama for Beginners to every 50th Facebook Friend!
BMG on Facebook

About
About us
Rules of the road - please read!
Formatting and multimedia tips
Email us
RSS feed

BMG TRAFFIC REPORT
Blue Mass. Swag
Creative Commons License

Event Calendar
February 2010
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* 01 02 03 04 05 06
07 08 09 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 * * * * * *
<< (add event) >>

Active Users
Currently 25 user(s) logged on.

Search




Advanced Search


Blog Roll
Massachusetts Left
.08 Acres
Below Boston
Berkshires Blog
Blue News Tribune
Chimes at Midnight
Eisenthal Report
Granby 01033
Health Care for All
Left in Lowell
MA lefty blogs
Marry in Mass.
Mass Engagement
Massachusetts Liberal
Michael Forbes-Wilcox
My Dedham
Progressive Mass.
Quriltai on the Shore
Ryan's Take
Someday I Will
ShrewsBuried
Talking Stoneham
The Fray
Universal hub

Differently-Winged
John Daley
Mass. Pro-Life
No Looking Backwards
Peter Porcupine
Pundit Review
Red Mass Group
Scaling the Hill 2010

Mass. Media
David S. Bernstein
Cambridge politics
CommonWealth Unbound
Globe bloggers
Herald bloggers
Hub Blog
Jon Keller
MassBeacon
Media Nation (Dan Kennedy)
Open Media Boston
Adam Reilly
Toll Talk (Mary Connaughton)
Weekly Dig Blog

Legal
ACS Blog
Balkinization
Election law
How Appealing
SCOTUSblog
Volokh Conspiracy

General
Accountable Strategies
Billionaires for Bush
Blue Works Better
Crooks and Liars
Daily Howler
Daily Kos
Democracy Arsenal
Eschaton (Atrios)
Glenn Greenwald
Grist (environment blog)
Hullabaloo (Digby)
LiberalOasis
MyDD
Oliver Willis
Pandagon
Political Animal
Political Critic
Political Wire
Poor Man
Progressive Blog Digest
Real Climate
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Tapped
Talking Points Memo
Think Progress
Truth and Progress
Turn Maine Blue
Wonkette

www.BlueMassGroup.com

BMG and David = "These people"?

by: GoldsteinGoneWild

Mon Feb 16, 2009 at 20:46:06 PM EST


(No doubt Carroll was referring to someone else, because this was his response to BMG. Speak, memory ...

- promoted by Bob)

Just wondering

John Carroll, professor of mass communication at Boston University and senior media analyst for WBUR-FM, recalled how he was "flame-broiled on the Internet" for missing the satire in a blog he cited on television. Carroll chose not to fire back, but acknowledged he might have made a mistake.

"What I decided to do - and I don't recommend this - was not to respond because I thought there is just no bottom to that well," he said.

"You'll never win getting into spitting matches with these people. And they have a lot more time on their hands than I do."


GoldsteinGoneWild :: BMG and David = "These people"?
Tags: (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Actually ... (5.50 / 2)
Carroll behaved most decently of anyone in that whole brouhaha. He did admit his mistake. I don't know why he remembers differently now.

Anyway, I'm constantly amused by the notion that "bloggers" are this special breed apart -- people with special powers, or special malice, or whatever. Bloggers are jes' folks. We are three guys with a website -- well, actually thousands of people with a website, at this point. And the variety of viewpoints among bloggers probably roughly scans with that of the public at large. I don't see why this is so mysterious.

---

Blue Mass. Group
So what politics do you deserve?


I think we do have special powers (6.00 / 1)
No, really.  The bloggers (not: readers/lurkers) who stick around either (a) have really thick skin, or (b) are getting enough positive feedback to stay around.  That feedback could be ratings, responses, attaboys, whatever.  In any case, I do think there's been a sort of evolutionary process that's taken case, where only particular types of people blog.

the variety of viewpoints among bloggers probably roughly scans with that of the public at large.

In terms of spectrum, sure.  But it seems pretty clear to me that the left part of the spectrum has far more representation than the right part, just as the radio spectrum has far more representation on the right than the left does, Air American notwithstanding.


[ Parent ]
What's more (6.00 / 1)
He admitted his mistake in misunderstanding the post, and further admitted his mistake in trying to ignore the conversation, rather than join it.  He handled himself well, all told.

~~~~
Believe it or not, I have even more to say...


[ Parent ]
Truly hilarious. (0.00 / 0)
And, just for the record:

Carroll added a postscript: "One of the people who was sandblasting me for an entire week on his local political blog actually eight months later tried to friend me on Facebook."

Wasn't me.


Psh, you don't friend people because you're their friend (6.00 / 1)
you friend them because you want to stalk their profile and they are either not in your network or are private. DUH.  Leave it to old people to not get the interwebz.

[ Parent ]
JoeTS! (0.00 / 0)
I never knew you were 1337.

[ Parent ]
stomv (0.00 / 0)
was pwnd!  

---
My thoughts are mine and mine alone. They should not be considered representative of any other organization, group or person - save me.

~Ryan.


[ Parent ]
Read what you just wrote (0.00 / 0)
you friend them because you want to stalk their profile

I think John understood that quite well.


[ Parent ]
Hey... (6.00 / 7)
Carroll was right about you people.  

He screws up a story and misquotes David and you had to call him on it.  It's just like you.

Now he creates his own fantasy revised history, with unicorns and rainbows and you had to post what actually happened again.  He's right, there is no bottom to this well.  I hope you can live with yourselves.

Listening to Charlie Baker talk about fiscal responsibility is like getting lectured on abstinence from Paris Hilton - Tim Murray


You know this is another example (0.00 / 0)
Of Carroll not "getting" blogs.

Even dKos is very very forgiving to mea culpas once they sink in (does anyone else remember the Clinton/Obama wars? Or a million other times the progressives were angry about one Dem politician or another?). They are quite susceptible to reason, yes, even on dKos.

The fact is, John Carroll himself could have, if he wanted, spent 10 minutes posting something here, on dKos, or any number of places with his explanation personally, if he'd really wanted to try and interact (yes, interact) with the bloggers.

However, there's two problems with the trad-med: they think we're competition (please!), and they are territorial. The second is that they take what a few people say and extrapolate that the whole thing is a noisy mess not worth engaging. Let's say Carroll did post on dKos. There would have been the 10% of the jerky "you suck" comments, but valuable discussion still would have taken place. But it's the 10% that sticks in their minds. They think they should be treated with deference (and by they, I mean the lot of them, the trad-med, not Carroll personally, necessarily).

Hate to say this, Carroll, but the future of news and media includes blogs - influential ones, even, ones that can do some of the job of keeping the fourth estate alive. You would do well to try to understand and even work with them. Hell, in college journalism courses everywhere, blogs are one of the things taught by in-tune professors. (I know, I've talked to classes about blogging.)

Carroll on facebook? Ya know, maybe there's hope for him yet.

Left in Lowell: cuz why read the Lowell Sun if you don't have to? ;)


Sorry, just to add (0.00 / 0)
It's the top-down scenario of traditional news, versus netroots and ground-up models. (Witness my own experiences dealing with the Lowell Sun.) That's what the trad-med are seriously scared about. Having to be accountable for the things you say to the rabble, instead of just to an editor.

There are good reasons that both models are important, but to treat the second with derision is, honestly, job suicide in my opinion.

By the way, half of the big bloggers actually were, or are, journalists. I find it amusing that bloggers are attacked for being "these people" that are impossible to deal with, when you have people like Josh Marshall doing blog work that crosses right into real, golly, honest-to-goodness hard news.  

Left in Lowell: cuz why read the Lowell Sun if you don't have to? ;)


[ Parent ]



I support WWF


Political insider ad network Law blog ad network
Advertise Liberally









Powered by: SoapBlox