Support BMG PAC!
About BMG PAC
Make a secure credit card contribution using Google Checkout:
$
Or send a check to BMG PAC, PO Box 877, Medford, MA 02155.
View BMG PAC's latest disclosure report


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?



FREE COPY OF BOB'S BOOK Barack Obama for Beginners to every 50th Facebook Friend!
BMG on Facebook

About
About us
Rules of the road - please read!
Formatting and multimedia tips
Email us
RSS feed

BMG TRAFFIC REPORT
Blue Mass. Swag
Creative Commons License

Event Calendar
February 2010
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* 01 02 03 04 05 06
07 08 09 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 * * * * * *
<< (add event) >>

Active Users
Currently 34 user(s) logged on.

Search




Advanced Search


Blog Roll
Massachusetts Left
.08 Acres
Below Boston
Berkshires Blog
Blue News Tribune
Chimes at Midnight
Eisenthal Report
Granby 01033
Health Care for All
Left in Lowell
MA lefty blogs
Marry in Mass.
Mass Engagement
Massachusetts Liberal
Michael Forbes-Wilcox
My Dedham
Progressive Mass.
Quriltai on the Shore
Ryan's Take
Someday I Will
ShrewsBuried
Talking Stoneham
The Fray
Universal hub

Differently-Winged
John Daley
Mass. Pro-Life
No Looking Backwards
Peter Porcupine
Pundit Review
Red Mass Group
Scaling the Hill 2010

Mass. Media
David S. Bernstein
Cambridge politics
CommonWealth Unbound
Globe bloggers
Herald bloggers
Hub Blog
Jon Keller
MassBeacon
Media Nation (Dan Kennedy)
Open Media Boston
Adam Reilly
Toll Talk (Mary Connaughton)
Weekly Dig Blog

Legal
ACS Blog
Balkinization
Election law
How Appealing
SCOTUSblog
Volokh Conspiracy

General
Accountable Strategies
Billionaires for Bush
Blue Works Better
Crooks and Liars
Daily Howler
Daily Kos
Democracy Arsenal
Eschaton (Atrios)
Glenn Greenwald
Grist (environment blog)
Hullabaloo (Digby)
LiberalOasis
MyDD
Oliver Willis
Pandagon
Political Animal
Political Critic
Political Wire
Poor Man
Progressive Blog Digest
Real Climate
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Tapped
Talking Points Memo
Think Progress
Truth and Progress
Turn Maine Blue
Wonkette

www.BlueMassGroup.com

You heard it here first! Jim Aloisi explains transportation reform as "the necessary thing to do"

by: David

Fri Feb 20, 2009 at 13:01:18 PM EST


Secretary of Transportation Jim Aloisi was kind enough to chat with us last night for about 45 minutes explaining the ins and outs of Governor Patrick's transportation reform bill.  We believe these are Secretary Aloisi's first on-the-record comments regarding the bill.

Overview

Aloisi was emphatic about how important it is to achieve sweeping transportation reform immediately.

No one's going to vote for net new revenue, a gas tax or any other approach, in 2010.  That's an election year.  It isn't going to happen.  We can't afford to wait until 2011.  Not with a $165 million deficit at the T, not with the Turnpike near bankruptcy, not with the regional transit authorities underfunded, and not with the need to bring new revenue into the rest of the system.  We just can't do it....  At some point, we've just got to talk the honest truth to each other....

I can't say I'm a regular viewer of Blue Mass. Group, but I know that people had some opinions about me.  And if you want to know about me, you're going to know ... that I didn't take a pay cut to take this job to lie to you, or to anybody else.  I believe sincerely in what we're doing, so I'm going to use that passion when we're talking to the Senate and to the House.... It's not merely well-intentioned and it's not just the right thing to do.  It's the essential, the necessary thing to do....

There's an opportunity to get the future right.... This is the moment.  It's not going to happen next year.  It's going to happen now, or it's not going to happen.  And if it doesn't happen, we're in big trouble.

Gas tax and tolls

On the details, Aloisi confirmed today's Globe headline: the Governor proposes a 19-cent increase in the gas tax (from 23.5 to 42.5, which with the 18.4 cent federal tax will total 60.9 cents a gallon).  Aloisi explained that the 19 cents will be dedicated as follows:

6 cents "to save the T from imminent budget disaster";
4 cents "to save the Turnpike and its toll payers from the imminent toll increases that you've read about in the paper that are really sky-high and are going to be very harmful to people";
1.5 cents for "regional transit authorities, to both forward fund them and to fund them in addition to their current level of funding";
2 cents to "moving people in the highway department off of the capital budget, freeing up capital dollars" (apparently many highway department employees' salaries are now paid from the capital budget -- i.e., the money is borrowed -- instead of from the operating budget);
1.5 cents for targeted regional road projects;
3 cents for rail projects outside of Boston;
1 cent for innovative gas and toll solutions.
[UPDATED -- the Secretary misspoke last night on the precise breakdown.]

Aloisi explained that when the Turnpike Authority meets next week, it "will have to vote a toll increase," but if the legislature acts on the gas tax proposal in time, the toll increase would never be implemented.  The Governor's proposal, if adopted, is to "enable tolls to come down west of 128, and it will enable us to hold the current level of tolls in the urban system steady."  He confirmed that, under the Governor's plan, the toll increase that will be voted next week would never be implemented.

Aloisi also confirmed that the Turnpike Authority will be eliminated, and that all of the state's transportation agencies will be reorganized under the control of the Governor.

Pension and benefits reform

Aloisi told us that many of the more extravagant perks and benefits that now run through the transportation system -- Exhibit A being the T's "23 and out" pension where a worker can retire on a full pension after 23 years of service, regardless of age -- will come to an end.

David :: You heard it here first! Jim Aloisi explains transportation reform as "the necessary thing to do"
We're not anti-labor.  There will be people downsized when we merge the Turnpike and the Highway Department, and we want to offer people workforce retraining and other initiatives, because we care about people.  But at the same time, the practice at the MBTA of 23-and-out in terms of pension, or the practice of not having the same health care plan as everyone else in state government, those things have to come to an end.  And we're going to make sure that in this bill, we're not going to be unfriendly to people, but we're going to be clear that the perks and the special deals of the past are over.

Aloisi said that they have looked at legal and collective bargaining issues regarding the benefits at the T, and that they see no legal obstacles to the changes.  Collective bargaining agreements currently in effect would be honored until they expire.

In response to Charley's follow-up on the T issues, Aloisi said that the new rule will be

Fifty-five....  We're not going to disturb 23, but you won't be able to retire until you're 55 years old.  And new employees, we're going to move to the chapter 32 system like everybody else.  So we're going to try to phase out the T's current approach.... With new employees, and with employees at the Pike as well, everyone will be under the state pension chapter 32 system.

"Vehicle miles traveled" system

Of interest to many on this site, Aloisi confirmed that the Governor will propose a pilot program to adopt a "vehicle miles traveled" system, along the lines of what is currently underway in Oregon.  According to Aloisi, a pilot program could be started as soon as a bill is passed that would begin testing the plan, including strategies like peak pricing.  He believes that "you can do this is a way that is completely clean with respect to people's concerns about privacy."  He also explained that a system like this is necessary because as cars become more fuel efficient, the value of the gas tax will plummet.

If we don't act now to anticipate a very soon-to-come greener vehicular fuel efficiency environment, we're dead.  There's no alternative.  The best solution is to say to people, you pay for what you use.  It's transparent, it's fair, and it's fungible, and I'm really excited about it....

Aloisi confirmed that there will be a credit for vehicle-miles-traveled against the gas tax, so that drivers will not be double-taxed.

Hummer tax and people with disabilities

I asked Aloisi about billxi's concern that the "Hummer tax" would adversely affect the disability community.  He responded:

Maybe we need to think about that.  It's a point I haven't thought about until this minute, but I think the answer is we've got to be open to understanding how normative approaches to things often do discriminate against various categories of people.  I'll think about it, and we'll see what we can do.... I'm sensitive to it, and you can always figure out, I think, how to create appropriate exceptions to rules.

We also understand that the RMV would be authorized to create regulations with respect to the "Hummer tax," so RMV should have the ability to carve out exceptions for situations like billxi's.

A new website

Finally (for now), part of the reform is to increase interactivity with the public.  And to that end, they've set up a new website that is designed to improve transparency and to enhance the ability to interact directly with the state transportation agencies.  I haven't had a chance to explore it yet -- if you do, let us know what you think.

Tags: , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Nice job (6.00 / 1)
And a much more fascinating look than what you can get from the Glob or Sun IMHO. Obviously this is in line more with an interview than reporting, but I think some very valid points and tough questions were raised.

It'll be interesting to see what happens this year on this subject.

Left in Lowell: cuz why read the Lowell Sun if you don't have to? ;)


My first thought to a gas tax increase (0.00 / 0)
was, wow, that's a huge increase.

My second thought was, that's $1.90 every time I fill my small-tanked car. Not so bad.

My last thought: wow, what does Western Massachusetts get out of the deal?

A rose by any other name is still a rose by another name.


No tolls West of 128 (6.00 / 1)
Something that politicians have promised for years, but never delivered on.


[ Parent ]
Plus forward-funding and increased funding (0.00 / 0)
of the Regional Transit Authorities.

[ Parent ]
Yeah (0.00 / 0)
Because we use public transit so heavily (well, the hubby does), we barely fill up our one car's ~10-gal tank once a week or so. For us then it'd be about a $100/year increase in taxes. But then, less of an increase in the MBTA pass that we buy each month, or in our property taxes hopefully...to pay for things like our regional transport authority or fixing roads, etc.

For us it works out, because we behave responsibly. (We bought our home deliberately where we did because of the train proximity.) I can see where an extra $100+/year in gas taxes (more likely more than $100, since lots of people own bigger cars and commute in them) will make people upset, but then, why should we reward poor behavior (and it is poor behavior to buy a car bigger than you really need) and not good behavior (buying a hybrid which costs more but less to operate in the long run)?

Growing up, my family had medium sized cars and we did juuuust fine in them. I don't understand why such small families (3-4 people) need minivans and SUVs. Sure, taking our 2 nieces around for a day in the little Corolla was cramped, but that car is tiny...you could buy a slightly larger car with more trunk space and do just fine.

Here you are, having kids and wanting the best for their future, and you buy something that pollutes twice as much or more than my 13-year old clunker Toyota. Talk about not thinking long term...

Left in Lowell: cuz why read the Lowell Sun if you don't have to? ;)


[ Parent ]
Umm... (0.00 / 0)
If we're talking about the MBTA, it is not accessible. And the Worcester WRTA is horrible, with broken buses and rude drivers.

[ Parent ]
MBTA is neither 0 nor 1. (0.00 / 0)
What is accessible?

The Ride
Most buses
About half of the Green Line
Most of the Red, Blue, and Orange Lines
The Silver Line
About half of Commuter Rail
Commuter Boat

Now, half isn't anything to celebrate -- after all, a rider needs accessible start and end, which means roughly 25% of all trips (.5 * .5) will be accessible.  However, the MBTA is spending oodles of money revamping stations, which include elevators, ramps, and other handicap accessibility improvements.

Note that these expenditures are money losers -- the additional riders will never make up for the expenditures.  Still, it's the right thing to do and we ought to continue pressuring the MBTA to make improvements not just for those with mobility handicaps, but also those who are blind and deaf.


But honestly, the statement

If we're talking about the MBTA, it is not accessible.

makes you a crank and a liar.

[ Parent ]
Transportation reform press release (6.00 / 1)
Here 'tis.

GOVERNOR PATRICK ANNOUNCES TRANSPORTATION AND ECONOMIC SECURITY PLAN
Plan Reforms Big-Dig Culture, Rebuilds Trust and Transparency to Help Secure the Commonwealth's Economic Future

BOSTON - Friday, February 20, 2009 - Governor Deval Patrick today announced his vision for a comprehensive reform plan to radically simplify the Commonwealth's transportation system, while addressing serious fiscal challenges stemming from decades of neglect and inaction, and a failed bureaucracy under the "Big Dig" culture.

Governor Patrick's Transportation and Economic Security Plan incorporates recommendations from the Transportation Finance Commission Report that uncovered decades of inaction and neglect under previous administrations. After receiving this report in 2007, Governor Patrick started to develop a plan to secure the Commonwealth's economic future and maintain safety of the state's roads and bridges.

The Transportation and Economic Security Plan, which builds on innovative reforms proposed by Senate President Therese Murray, follows an aggressive two-year reform effort led by the Patrick Administration that has saved taxpayers $83 million in savings and efficiencies throughout the transportation bureaucracy.

"The days of irresponsibility, of avoiding the truth and the consequences, must end and end now. We are all out of time. Now is the time to reform, rebuild and renew our system from top to bottom," said Governor Patrick. "The good news is that right now, we have a once-in-a-generation opportunity to coordinate federal stimulus funds, state capital money, our accelerated bridge program, and the reforms in the Transportation and Economic Security Plan to make our roads and bridges safer, grow jobs, and build a strong economic future."

Reforming the Big Dig Culture

The Commonwealth's transportation system faces an estimated $15 to $19 billion funding gap in the next 20 years to maintain the current network of roads, bridges and transit for safe, reliable service. A 2007 report issued by the Transportation Finance Commission stated: "The cost of this neglect will be felt in our regional economy and in our way of life. ... Business as usual will not suffice."

Crushing debt and substandard management from the Big Dig has siphoned much-needed dollars away from maintenance and operations, and fed a culture of out-of-scale benefits, inefficiencies and a lack of accountability.

Under Governor Patrick's leadership, the transportation agencies and authorities have generated more than $83 million in savings and efficiencies through transportation reform efforts, while working on a long-term reform plan. Those reforms include:

Joining 49 other states in using civilian flaggers on construction projects
Streamlining project delivery time at MassHighway by 40%
Saving $47 million at the MBTA by reducing overtime costs and staff levels and increasing employee health care contributions.
Saving $31 million at the Turnpike by eliminating middle management and toll takers
With the legislature's support, launching the Accelerated Bridge Repair Program to address the backlog of maintenance projects left by previous administrations

Patrick Reform Plan: A Unified Transportation Agency

In spite of these efforts, it is necessary to implement reforms that radically simplify the current system to build a modern transportation network that is adequately funded and professionally managed to help secure our economic future.

Governor Patrick and his transportation team, led by Transportation Secretary James A. Aloisi Jr., have put forward a comprehensive reorganization plan that builds a unified and transparent transportation system through the following reforms:

Creates a consolidated Executive Office of Transportation with four Divisions: Highway, Rail & Transit, Aviation & Port, and Registry of Motor Vehicles
Abolishes the Turnpike Authority and create one highway, tunnel, and bridge system
Consolidates state aviation assets
Creates an Office of Performance Management to ensure public accountability and transparency
Enacts all Transportation Finance Commission Reform (TFC) Recommendations, including creation of a Private Project Ombudsman to streamline project development, which could save $2.5 billion over 20 years

Renewing Investments to Secure Economic Future

In addition to simplifying the system, the Commonwealth must address significant long-term financial challenges throughout its transportation agencies and authorities. The Transportation and Economic Security Plan will help pay down debt and make sound, sustainable investments to fix crumbling roads and bridges and secure the state's economic future. The plan includes the following reforms:

Restructuring and simplifying our transportation bureaucracy, including abolishing the Turnpike Authority
Ending the "23 and out" special perk in the MBTA pension system
Bringing the Turnpike and MBTA employees into the state health care system
Increasing accountability and transparency throughout the transportation system
Making our transportation system more environmentally-responsible
Streamlining operations and eliminating 300 positions
Working to move MassHighway personnel off the capital budget and back onto the regular payroll
Increasing the state fuel tax to pay down debt and avoid toll and fare increases, while exploring innovative solutions to start phasing out the fuel tax, such as using a pilot GPS-based technology to collect fees electronically.

The plan proposes a fuel tax increase of 19 cents - approximately $8 per month for most drivers. Future increases would follow the Consumer Price Index (an essential component that the state failed to do last time). The gas tax has not been increased since 1991. The Governor said he will not support an increase in the gas tax without several other restructurings and reforms outlined in his plan.

The plan is transparent and accountable on the new revenue from the gas tax, accounting for and dedicating each new penny to a specific transportation initiative:

4 cents to roll back the proposed toll increases on the Turnpike
6 cents to preserve current MBTA services and prevent a fare increase
1 cent for Innovative Gas and Toll Solutions
1.5 cents for Regional Transit Authorities
1.5 cents for targeted regional road projects
3 cents for rail projects outside of Boston
2 cents to address the costly practice of paying for personnel with bond funds

"Raising the gas tax is a last resort, and without it, our economy will suffer," said Governor Patrick. "Our long-term job growth and economic security, along with the safety of our roads and bridges, depends upon both major reforms and new revenue now."

"We must act immediately to free our transportation system from the stranglehold of debt so we can finally make the long-awaited investments necessary to improve service and reliability," said Secretary Aloisi. "Our goal is to build an open and accountable transportation agency for future generations that supports economic growth, regional equity and responsible environmental stewardship."

Creating a "Greener" Transportation System

The transportation sector is the largest and fastest-growing source of greenhouse gas emissions in the region. The Transportation and Economic Security Plan will make the state's transportation system more environmentally responsible through "Green" initiatives that encourage more fuel-efficient vehicles and "Buy and Build Green" provisions.

These initiatives will encourage environmentally responsible practices and give people the opportunity to drive less with increased access to transit, bicycling and walking:

Unprecedented public transportation investments outside of Greater Boston
Mandates Massport to participate in public transportation initiatives serving its facilities
Authorizes a "green car" sliding scale for new automobile registration fees
Adopts and implements "Buy Green" and "Build Green" provisions
Authorizes "Complete Streets" Initiative to encourage bicycling and walking

Encouraging Civic Engagement

Keeping to Governor Patrick's commitment to transparency and encouraging civic engagement, additional information is posted online at the Executive Office of Transportation's You Move Massachusetts website at http://www.mass.gov/youmovemas...

The website will allow residents to download and view documents, submit comments and track progress of the reform plan through a new blog and updates from Secretary Aloisi and transportation officials.

They've also released a spiffy chart (pdf) that summarizes the Transportation Finance Commission report's recommendations and lines up how prior reforms and this bill match those recommendations.


We Pay One Way or Another (0.00 / 0)
One of the points that I heard the governor make was the cost to drivers to their cars, beyond normal wear and tear, for poorly maintained roads.  

Kate Donaghue, volunteer.

Another mitigating factor (0.00 / 0)
The increase in price due to the tax will likely reduce the demand on the product, thereby reducing the pre-tax price of the product.


[ Parent ]
A political challenge (0.00 / 0)
This is a pretty big challenge being thrown at the Legislature, particularly when it comes to MBTA employee benefits. Gov. Patrick is arguing from the moral highground and with popular opinion on his side -- one of the few times he's been able to do that since being sworn in.

It will be interesting to see what the Legislature's response is: do they go along with it, or defend a very well-organized voting bloc?  


new web site? (0.00 / 0)
That new web site seems unresponsive.  Is it really set up yet?

Possibly not. (0.00 / 0)
Might not be fully live 'til next week.

[ Parent ]
Western MA perspective (0.00 / 0)
Here is my Western MA perspective.

1) There are already no tolls from Ludlow to West Stockbridge, so removing tolls "West of 128" actually benefits Central MA, not Western MA.

2) Forward-funding and increased funding of the RTAs isn't going to excite many people because I think the conventional wisdom out here is that public transit is for the poor or elderly who have no cars. Why? Because given the choice of driving 15 minutes to your destination or taking the bus which will take an hour, only those forced to do so will do this.

3) There is a pervasive perception that this money is needed because of the Big Dig, and people out here are sick of that project continuing to be a black hole for dollars. At the very least, if it is true, let's "retire" the Big Dig once and for all.

4) Although the population center of this state is in the East, there are probably more roads and bridges in the West. The conventional wisdom is that most of the infrastructure repair will, as always, go to the Boston area, with the majority of it being inside of 128. It might help to get more specific on additional projects being funded with this, other than "outside of Boston".

5) Is this proposal shifting revenue sources from out-of-state drivers (like those coming from New York) to MA residents?

6) I think it is really important to pump up the "reform" part of this proposal, because the perception is still driven by Howie Carr, that MTA employees are politically connected overpaid hacks.

7) It would have been nice to phase the tax increase in too. Instead of a 19 cent overnight jump, why not 5 cents a month or something? Might be harder on gas station owners, but it won't be as in-your-face.

8) It would be nice to keep the increase just low enough so that we can't be called "the highest gas tax in the country". That will be a rallying cry for "Taxachusetts" whiners.  


BMG3, why didn't you call me? (6.00 / 3)
I so would have loved to have been a part of that discussion.

In any case, a few observations:
1.
Public transit share of increased gas tax:
6.0 cents MBTA
1.5 cents Regional transit authorities
---
7.5 cents

Auto transit share of increased gas tax:
4.0 cents Turnpike
3.0 cents Toll Removal
1.5 cents Highway dept budget revision
---
8.5 cents

Mixed transit share
3.0 cents Regional road/bridge/rail projects outside Boston
---
3.0 cents

Given that there's far more infrastructure in roads than non-road transit outside Boston, I'd bet that the majority of that 3.0 cents also goes toward auto.

Is that share fair?  Meh.  One man's fair is another man's cross-subsidy.  Personally, I'd like to see another two cents: one penny additional earmarked specifically to pay for debt obligations handed to the MBTA by the lege when conjuring the Big Dig financing.  I'd also love to see one more penny out of that gas tax to go straight to human-powered-transit improvement: crosswalks, curb cuts, sidewalk installs and repairs, bike lanes, bike paths, DCR paths (Esplanade etc), etc.  In each case, is a penny the right amount, based on budget analysis?  No idear.  In any case, while this increase isn't exactly the way I'd like to see it, there is a lot for me to like.


2.
Like Aloisi, I'm not anti-labor.  I also understand that the financial differential between the MBTA's retirement policy and a typical gov't retirement plan is a teensy tiny part of the MBTA's budget deficit.  But, changing it from "23 and out" to "23 and out if you're 55 years old, otherwise work another year or three" seems like a pretty small change.  Why not go for more?  I don't know how much more, but maybe "25 and out if you're 57 years old, otherwise work more" would be a little better.  Or, how about: "whatever other state employees get in terms of retirement terms".  Heck, if they did that for all new hires and didn't change a thing for existing employees, we'd grow our way to a system which was treating all state employees fairly.


3.
The idea that "as cars become more fuel efficient, the value of the gas tax will plummet" is pure nonsense.  Cars will become more fuel efficient, but it is going to take many years for it to happen.    Furthermore, since the average lifespan of a car in the USA is 7 years, even as new cars do become more fuel efficient there's a tremendous lag in the time for that efficiency to propagate through the system.  Check out this data, which is a bit dated but not too old:

Notice that total fleet fuel economy was the same in 1979 as it was in 2004.  The same.  So, this idea that within a few years the revenues from gas tax will drop dramatically is really unfounded.  If the gas tax revenue drops two or three years in a row, then you raise the gas tax.  After all, if people are getting higher MPG then they're paying less total money in gas taxes -- so by raising the tax per gallon you're merely restoring the dollars they're paying in gas tax to the previous level.

The idea that paying per mile makes sense in some regard as a use tax.  But, there's a few things that the gas tax does which per mile doesn't:
a.  It puts a premium on the environmental cost of burning fuel.  Use fee only charges for road use, not for the externalities of burning fuel.
b.  Large vehicles (SUVs, etc) damage the road significantly more than small vehicles.  Large vehicles tend to get worse MPG.  A road use charge doesn't charge the large vehicles more for the extra damage... the gas tax does (though not perfectly of course).
c.  Universal use fees really do run the risk of privacy invasions -- and even if I trust the current state administration, I don't trust future state or federal administrations with my transportation information.


All told, I'm pretty happy with the plan and very impressed that Mr. Aloisi came and talked with BMG.


nice (0.00 / 0)
I like your three points on gas tax instead of use fee, because the gas tax for me was always partly about making sure we pay the real cost of usage of the fuel, rather than for merely its own sake. Also, that as fuel efficiency goes up, that raising the gas tax to compensate still makes sense, that's a good point, IMHO. That way, you're still incentivizing people to get even MORE efficient, and charging the people who are not bother to.

Left in Lowell: cuz why read the Lowell Sun if you don't have to? ;)

[ Parent ]
My Suggestion For tThe Hummer Tax (0.00 / 0)
 Make the exception for Disability Plates. I'm ok with excepting Veterans Plates too. Disability placards really don't need an exception, because they are transferable from vehicle to vehicle. Chances are good that the placard user is a passenger. My thoughts onlty, subject to critique. I'm sincerely trying to be helpful here, so recognize that please?

Forgive my typos (0.00 / 0)
I was using the Dell.

[ Parent ]
Not bad... (0.00 / 0)
but not all folks who have disability plates need a particular vehicle.  In fact, I'd venture that most don't.

So, instead of having a one-size-fits-all exception, why not just create a form which allows for anyone to apply for an exception.  One reason might be for disability access (van or SUV with motorized wheelchair accessory, ease of getting in and out of vehicle, etc).  There might be others, though I can't think of any off the top of my head.

Of course, like anything, care must be taken so that the exceptions aren't abused, and care must be taken so that the exception process isn't overly cumbersome.

Then again, it might be that the percent of disability plates is so low that it's just easier to make the exception for all plate holders, and not worry if a few disabled folks whos disability doesn't justify a gas guzzler buy one anyway.


[ Parent ]
I gave a starting point. (0.00 / 0)
I know that placard abuse is rampant. i also know that any police type person will jump at the chance to nail the inconsiderate bastards. Just two days ago, I noticed a lady in her SUV grab the handicapped spot and it's accompanying diagonal spot for disabled folks to actually be able to use the space. I asked her to move her vehicle. "why, I left you room?"  "not enough for my wheelchair". She grudgingly moved over enough, still parked illegally. It happens all the time.

[ Parent ]
no thanks... (0.00 / 0)
19.5 cents..per gallon..but only 1.5 cents goes to road/bridge ..'repairs'?  no thanks deval,it sounds
like those of us who drive the most (i.e.-still have jobs to commute to) will get nothing besides worsening roads.
I'm not interested in free passage thru the tunnels or bridges as I don't use them now. As for the T,find some
stimulus money to bail them out,useless hacks...




I support WWF


Political insider ad network Law blog ad network
Advertise Liberally









Powered by: SoapBlox