Support BMG PAC!
About BMG PAC
Make a secure credit card contribution using Google Checkout:
$
Or send a check to BMG PAC, PO Box 877, Medford, MA 02155.
View BMG PAC's latest disclosure report


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?



FREE COPY OF BOB'S BOOK Barack Obama for Beginners to every 50th Facebook Friend!
BMG on Facebook

About
About us
Rules of the road - please read!
Formatting and multimedia tips
Email us
RSS feed

BMG TRAFFIC REPORT
Blue Mass. Swag
Creative Commons License

Event Calendar
February 2010
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* 01 02 03 04 05 06
07 08 09 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 * * * * * *
<< (add event) >>

Active Users
Currently 28 user(s) logged on.

Search




Advanced Search


Blog Roll
Massachusetts Left
.08 Acres
Below Boston
Berkshires Blog
Blue News Tribune
Chimes at Midnight
Eisenthal Report
Granby 01033
Health Care for All
Left in Lowell
MA lefty blogs
Marry in Mass.
Mass Engagement
Massachusetts Liberal
Michael Forbes-Wilcox
My Dedham
Progressive Mass.
Quriltai on the Shore
Ryan's Take
Someday I Will
ShrewsBuried
Talking Stoneham
The Fray
Universal hub

Differently-Winged
John Daley
Mass. Pro-Life
No Looking Backwards
Peter Porcupine
Pundit Review
Red Mass Group
Scaling the Hill 2010

Mass. Media
David S. Bernstein
Cambridge politics
CommonWealth Unbound
Globe bloggers
Herald bloggers
Hub Blog
Jon Keller
MassBeacon
Media Nation (Dan Kennedy)
Open Media Boston
Adam Reilly
Toll Talk (Mary Connaughton)
Weekly Dig Blog

Legal
ACS Blog
Balkinization
Election law
How Appealing
SCOTUSblog
Volokh Conspiracy

General
Accountable Strategies
Billionaires for Bush
Blue Works Better
Crooks and Liars
Daily Howler
Daily Kos
Democracy Arsenal
Eschaton (Atrios)
Glenn Greenwald
Grist (environment blog)
Hullabaloo (Digby)
LiberalOasis
MyDD
Oliver Willis
Pandagon
Political Animal
Political Critic
Political Wire
Poor Man
Progressive Blog Digest
Real Climate
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Tapped
Talking Points Memo
Think Progress
Truth and Progress
Turn Maine Blue
Wonkette

www.BlueMassGroup.com

Santa's Swaption Gift

by: Bob Neer

Wed Mar 04, 2009 at 15:28:36 PM EST


Looks like the BMG swaptions team missed this interesting AP article from 23 December 2008:

The Massachusetts Turnpike Authority has reached an agreement to get out of a risky deal with the bankrupt Lehman Brothers, which officials said netted $31 million and cleared away a fiscal cloud looming over the financially troubled agency.

Turnpike Executive Director Alan Lebovidge on Monday said the rare bit of positive financial news should have no effect on planned toll hikes, but at least one Turnpike board member said the deal should give the agency breathing room to delay any increases.

Alert BMG readers will remember that the reason you may soon have to pay $7 to travel on the Pike, or a lot more in gas taxes, is because the Turnpike Authority may have to pay $363-$470 million (reports vary) to cover another swaption agreement it made with Swiss bank (and IRS tax fraud enabler and Nazi slave labor exploiter) UBS. The Lehman agreement, according to the Authority's financial adviser Lamont Financial Services, was entered into to offset the UBS agreement. More here. So much for that offset, I guess. Interestingly, the AP article mentions another swaption agreement with J.P. Morgan that hasn't previously been discussed -- no doubt in a diligent effort to offset the Lehman and UBS agreements. Anyone care to make sense of this? Perhaps some of our beloved readers from the Turnpike Authority?

Bob Neer :: Santa's Swaption Gift
Tags: (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Shocking! (0.00 / 0)
Don't let your faith be shaken.  The JP Morgan banker who screwed the pooch this time is Jamie Oppedisano, a former staffer of Paul Haley and Sal DiMasi  Just add him to that stooge former state rep Pat Landers .

What does the nazi slave exploiter thing have to do with anything? (6.00 / 1)
Everyone who ran the bank back then is dead.

Are you saying we should punish the bank somehow because people who are now dead who formally ran the bank were bad people?  


While it may not be actually related to the swaptions thing. (6.00 / 1)
it does remain relevant.  The individuals who ran UBS "back then" may (or may not) be dead.  But the corporation benefited financially from exploiting slave labor, and those profits have inured -- and continue to inure -- to the benefit of UBS's shareholders.  If it hasn't already, it should disgorge those profits with interest.

[ Parent ]
They're dead. (0.00 / 0)
Nobody "runs" a bank at age 20 or 30.  Lets give in a minimum of 40, which is still young to run a bank.  That would make people who ran UBS back then over 100, if they were young.

Still, that's an 8 year old link, and I wonder if the problems noted in it have been settled by now.


[ Parent ]
More than you want to know about swaptions (0.00 / 0)
The JP Morgan swaption agreement was the first one, 1999, and the Pike got $5.3 million.  In '02 JP Morgan exercised its right and the Pike had to pony up the difference between what's known as the BMA (Bond Market Association Index) and Libor.  

This was in the 90s, very common.  Authorities needed cash from the bond market, you know for construction and stuff, but lenders wanted variable rate debt because the Authorities tend to be a bit unstable and aren't backed necessarily by the State's full faith and credit.  The BMA index, an index of variable rate munciple debt, was "invented" so that a market could be created for all the Authorities' Variable Rate Debt that was being issued throughout the US.

Even with hindsight, I have a hard time calling this an error on the part of the Pike.  All the Authorites were doing it and all the large investment banks were pushing the deals. Granted, they're complicated transaction, but isn't that why we pay them the big bucks?

Anyway, back to 1999.  The problem facing the Authorities was this:  Investors want variable rate debt and Authorities want predictable interest in order to set their rates. The solution  was the swaption.  JP Morgan undertakes to make debt interest payments so long as those payments are in a particular range. Authority i) gets cash and ii) for the cash assumes the risk that if interest rates move outside a particular range, it will have to pay JP Morgan.  All was well until '02.

The problem started In '02 when the BMA to Libor spread went unstable.  I remember it but don't remember what caused this, but I think something about the illiquidity of Swaptions and Fed tightening may have been key culprits.  (sound familiar?  think 2008 and CDS).  

Bottom line: The spread crept outside the negotiated range and Pike has been paying JP Morgan pretty much continuously since 2002, I think even to this day.  

The Pike can terminate the payment, but really can't because it doesn't have the cash or access to debt markets.  

Anyway, in 2004, the Pike called in Lehman to consult and the result was a swaption that I don't begin to understand, but its purpose was to somehow mitigate the variability of the JP Morgan payment. (i.e. not reduce the payment, but make it more predictable.)

The bankruptcy of Lehman confused this '04 swaption and the Pike's still trying to figure out what to do with it.  Suffice to say, Lehman defaulted on its payments to the Pike last year.

In between 1999 and 2004, UBS came on the scene with its 5 similarly complicated swaptions, which on a PV basis are a current cost to the pike of hundreds of millions of $$.



The Third Man (0.00 / 0)
Just for the record, you say the Morgan swaption was in 1999, Lehman in 2002, and UBS in 1999-2004. The Globe doesn't mention Morgan and says UBS was in 2001 (RFP says so too), and Lehman in 2002.

In any event, one of the most interesting 'graphs is Lamont's assertion with respect to the Lehman and UBS contracts:

The turnpike saw the two transactions as complementary, with one swap offsetting the risk of the other. ``It is highly likely that both swaptions will be exercised simultaneously," the turnpike's financial adviser, Lamont Financial Services, wrote at the time.

He doesn't mention the Morgan deal.

A third contract might explain a lot of things. In particular, how an ostensibly offsetting agreement in 2002 had become by 2008 a fiscal cloud.

Grateful to anyone who can correct any mistakes in any of the above.

BMG: Reality-based commentary.


[ Parent ]
Dates (0.00 / 0)
You're right.  The first UBS traunch was 2001.  But the Morgan deal was categorically in 1999, and the Pike began to pay JPM against it in 2002. There may be no regular mention of it because it's small relative to the UBS.

The Lehman agreement became a fiscal cloud because of the Lehman default in 2008.


[ Parent ]



I support WWF


Political insider ad network Law blog ad network
Advertise Liberally









Powered by: SoapBlox