Support BMG PAC!
About BMG PAC
Make a secure credit card contribution using Google Checkout:
$
Or send a check to BMG PAC, PO Box 877, Medford, MA 02155.
View BMG PAC's latest disclosure report


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?



FREE COPY OF BOB'S BOOK Barack Obama for Beginners to every 50th Facebook Friend!
BMG on Facebook

About
About us
Rules of the road - please read!
Formatting and multimedia tips
Email us
RSS feed

BMG TRAFFIC REPORT
Blue Mass. Swag
Creative Commons License

Event Calendar
February 2010
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* 01 02 03 04 05 06
07 08 09 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 * * * * * *
<< (add event) >>

Active Users
Currently 26 user(s) logged on.

Search




Advanced Search


Blog Roll
Massachusetts Left
.08 Acres
Below Boston
Berkshires Blog
Blue News Tribune
Chimes at Midnight
Eisenthal Report
Granby 01033
Health Care for All
Left in Lowell
MA lefty blogs
Marry in Mass.
Mass Engagement
Massachusetts Liberal
Michael Forbes-Wilcox
My Dedham
Progressive Mass.
Quriltai on the Shore
Ryan's Take
Someday I Will
ShrewsBuried
Talking Stoneham
The Fray
Universal hub

Differently-Winged
John Daley
Mass. Pro-Life
No Looking Backwards
Peter Porcupine
Pundit Review
Red Mass Group
Scaling the Hill 2010

Mass. Media
David S. Bernstein
Cambridge politics
CommonWealth Unbound
Globe bloggers
Herald bloggers
Hub Blog
Jon Keller
MassBeacon
Media Nation (Dan Kennedy)
Open Media Boston
Adam Reilly
Toll Talk (Mary Connaughton)
Weekly Dig Blog

Legal
ACS Blog
Balkinization
Election law
How Appealing
SCOTUSblog
Volokh Conspiracy

General
Accountable Strategies
Billionaires for Bush
Blue Works Better
Crooks and Liars
Daily Howler
Daily Kos
Democracy Arsenal
Eschaton (Atrios)
Glenn Greenwald
Grist (environment blog)
Hullabaloo (Digby)
LiberalOasis
MyDD
Oliver Willis
Pandagon
Political Animal
Political Critic
Political Wire
Poor Man
Progressive Blog Digest
Real Climate
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Tapped
Talking Points Memo
Think Progress
Truth and Progress
Turn Maine Blue
Wonkette

www.BlueMassGroup.com

Freedom of phone!

by: Charley on the MTA

Wed Dec 20, 2006 at 09:52:03 AM EST


This is long, long, overdue:

(...) Michael W. Morrissey, the Senate chairman of the Joint Committee on Telecommunications, Utilities, and Energy, is putting forth legislation to impose new regulations on cellular phone companies to make them more responsive to consumers.

The bill, drafted by Morrissey, would force the companies to issue semiannual public reports detailing their signal strength, their dead zones, and gaps in coverage, along with the number of dropped calls.

In addition, the legislation would allow customers with poor service to terminate their contract with their cellphone company without having to pay hefty penalties. Consumers would pay only a pro-rated share of the early termination fee, based on how long they have had their service; currently, customers who wish to get out of a service contract are usually required to pay the full termination fee.

I'm less interested in the spotty service than the coercive long-term contracts. As Howard Dean said rather un-poetically, "We need to re-regulate" -- but in this case, it's re-regulation on behalf of actual unfettered market competition, not the rigged game that the telcos would have you play. Chipping away at the Corporate Nanny State would be a tremendous accomplishment for the legislature and new Governor. How cool would it be to actually have real, fluid competition in cell phone service? Unlock the contracts, and the companies will have more incentive to improve service. Someone else has a better/cheaper phone plan? Go with them!

Keep your eye on this:

A spokeswoman for Senate President Robert E. Travaglini said it was too early to comment.

Uh huh.

"The overwhelming amount of public support for some significant change in the cellphone industry was tremendous," Cummings said. "But at the same time I have to say that each and every company showed up at our hearing and there was so much pressure by the industry it did not come of committee."

Uh huh.

Who runs this state, anyway? If these guys continue to get away with it, why don't we just call ourselves the Commonwealth of Verizochusetts and be done with it?

BTW, the State House switchboard is 617-722-2000, if you'd like your Senator to hear about this. Or just leave it to the telcos and Senators to hash it out amongst themselves; I'm sure they'll come up with something good.

(Next challenge: More cable TV and internet competition/A la carte cable.)

UPDATE: ... and just why is this legislation overdue? Sharpchick has an idea.

Charley on the MTA :: Freedom of phone!
Tags: , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Freedom of phone! | 6 comments
Charley, worcester is on it.. (0.00 / 0)
already...Last night an order was put by Council to the City Manager to come back with a report of where the "dead zones" are in the City.  We are also in the middle of our Cable renewal contract and our advisory committee was not very happy with how our ONLY provider, Charter is doing business. we are advocating for choice byt don't hink it's gonna happen, good thing is that this new contract won't be for 10 years like the last one.......

I agree with H.D. -  Re-regulate before one guy owns everything in  America...God help us if it's Donald Trump......


When you know better, you do better" - Maya Angelou


It occurs to me... (0.00 / 0)
That I'm not as concerned by dead spots b/c I live in a big metropolitan area, so I don't usually have to be. There's privilege for you.

---

Blue Mass. Group
So what politics do you deserve?


[ Parent ]
contracts (5.00 / 1)
I got my original 2 year Sprint contract in August 2003, so I was expecting to go month-to-month after August 2005.  In the summer of 2005, my landline had problems, and since I was working for Jesse Gordon's campaign as field & volunteer coordinator, I started maxing out my cell phone minutes, so I called Sprint to ask about other plans.  They did indeed have a plan that was much better suited for me, and I asked the salesperson repeatedly whether this would affect my contract period or delay when I go month-to-month.  With several assurances that it would not, I switched plans.  I found out a few months later that I was placed on a new 2-year contract, the salesperson was wrong, and there's no recourse, sorry. 

Now I have a perverse motive for not switching to a new Sprint plan, ever, even when my usage pattern changes and they have another plan that's better suited for it.


This is interesting (6.00 / 1)
Like the Globe story noted, a version of this bill was introduced last year (it's still available to read, SB 1790).

But notice something that the story does not connect, however, when it says:

Last year, six senators and 16 House members sponsored a Cell Phone Users' Bill of Rights, a more comprehensive piece of legislation put forward last year by MASSPIRG. ...  It was fiercely opposed by the industry, and it died in committee.

Guess who the Senate Chair of the Telecommunications Committe at the time was and still is?  Senator Michael Morrissey

This watered down bill (see Section 120 of original bill: "(a) No contract for wireless telephone service shall be for a term longer than twelve months") is already capitulating to Verizon.  That's fine if that's the way it has to be, but let's not try and pretend that this is the "high road" bill that just came into the scene.


Sharp eye, sharpchick (6.00 / 3)
As the lead on the Senate side of the complete version of the Cell Phone Users Bill of Rights (along with State Rep Steve Walsh of Lynn on the house side), it was painful to see the enormous influence of Big Telecom on the fate of this little bill.  While I was unaware Sen. Morrissey was filing this new bill, I can only view it as a partial step in the right...er, left direction.

Jarrett Barrios 


[ Parent ]
Can we chip away at the nanny state by forgetting the trans-fat ban instead? (4.00 / 1)
And don't forget - Marshmallow Fluff is TRANS-FAT FREE!

Yr. Obedient Servant, Peter Porcupine, Republican

Freedom of phone! | 6 comments



I support WWF


Political insider ad network Law blog ad network
Advertise Liberally









Powered by: SoapBlox