Support BMG PAC!
About BMG PAC
Make a secure credit card contribution using Google Checkout:
$
Or send a check to BMG PAC, PO Box 877, Medford, MA 02155.
View BMG PAC's latest disclosure report


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?



FREE COPY OF BOB'S BOOK Barack Obama for Beginners to every 50th Facebook Friend!
BMG on Facebook

About
About us
Rules of the road - please read!
Formatting and multimedia tips
Email us
RSS feed

BMG TRAFFIC REPORT
Blue Mass. Swag
Creative Commons License

Event Calendar
February 2010
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* 01 02 03 04 05 06
07 08 09 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 * * * * * *
<< (add event) >>

Active Users
Currently 27 user(s) logged on.

Search




Advanced Search


Blog Roll
Massachusetts Left
.08 Acres
Below Boston
Berkshires Blog
Blue News Tribune
Chimes at Midnight
Eisenthal Report
Granby 01033
Health Care for All
Left in Lowell
MA lefty blogs
Marry in Mass.
Mass Engagement
Massachusetts Liberal
Michael Forbes-Wilcox
My Dedham
Progressive Mass.
Quriltai on the Shore
Ryan's Take
Someday I Will
ShrewsBuried
Talking Stoneham
The Fray
Universal hub

Differently-Winged
John Daley
Mass. Pro-Life
No Looking Backwards
Peter Porcupine
Pundit Review
Red Mass Group
Scaling the Hill 2010

Mass. Media
David S. Bernstein
Cambridge politics
CommonWealth Unbound
Globe bloggers
Herald bloggers
Hub Blog
Jon Keller
MassBeacon
Media Nation (Dan Kennedy)
Open Media Boston
Adam Reilly
Toll Talk (Mary Connaughton)
Weekly Dig Blog

Legal
ACS Blog
Balkinization
Election law
How Appealing
SCOTUSblog
Volokh Conspiracy

General
Accountable Strategies
Billionaires for Bush
Blue Works Better
Crooks and Liars
Daily Howler
Daily Kos
Democracy Arsenal
Eschaton (Atrios)
Glenn Greenwald
Grist (environment blog)
Hullabaloo (Digby)
LiberalOasis
MyDD
Oliver Willis
Pandagon
Political Animal
Political Critic
Political Wire
Poor Man
Progressive Blog Digest
Real Climate
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Tapped
Talking Points Memo
Think Progress
Truth and Progress
Turn Maine Blue
Wonkette

www.BlueMassGroup.com

Our "liberal" senators: Apparently *not* in the pocket of PhRMA (updated)

by: Charley on the MTA

Tue May 08, 2007 at 08:57:49 AM EDT


(Bumped. - promoted by Charley on the MTA)

Update: From Senator Kerry's online coordinator:

John Kerry and Ted Kennedy have both worked for drug re-importation for a long time. And I know that John Kerry has never taken PhRMA money, so he's not in their pocket by any means. I was assured personally that both of them are totally committed to bringing up the Dorgan amendment to another bill. Where it will pass. This *will* pass the Senate.

In this case, however, the underlying bill wouldn't have passed without the "safety" provision (which we all know kills the re-importation for now). And there's a lot in the underlying bill that's important to get through, and a lot that PhRMA doesn't like about it. It reinstates the fees they pay when they apply for patents. It forces them to be more transparent in their safety and testing regimes. And it creates a situation where pediatric medicines get a higher priority than they do now.

This bill also closes some of the gaps in our food safety testing that has allowed outbreaks of disease in our food recently.

This is not about killing re-importation or being in the pocket of PhRMA (neither of our Senators fits that description). This is about choosing the best avenues to get results. The drug re-importation will pass the Senate. And our Senators will be part of why.

Well, if that's true, I cheerfully withdraw my objections. My original, and apparently premature, post is below.
----

Senators Kerry and Kennedy voted to scotch Sen. Dorgan's bill for drug re-importation from other countries:

WASHINGTON- In a triumph for the pharmaceutical industry, the Senate yesterday killed a drive to allow consumers to buy prescription drugs from abroad at a significant savings over domestic prices.

On a 49-40 vote, the Senate required the administration to certify the safety and effectiveness of imported drugs before they can be imported, a requirement that officials have said they cannot meet.

"Well, once again the big drug companies have proved that they are the most powerful and best financed lobby in Washington," said Sen. David Vitter, a Louisiana Republican.

Democratic Massachusetts Sens. Edward M. Kennedy and John F. Kerry both voted for the safety certification that nullified the chance for lower-cost drugs.

The vote neutralized a second amendment, later passed on a voice vote, that would legalize the importation of prescription drugs made in Canada, Australia, Europe, Japan and New Zealand.

Wow. Don't ever think your representatives actually represent you. They're looking out for someone else. Godzilla vs. Mothra politics continues, a great battle of special interests, before which the masses flee.

Of course, the real question is Why the hell do we have to re-import drugs from other countries at all? Why do Americans get the privilege of paying the highest prices in the world for prescription drugs?

This is PhRMA's world; we just live in it. Pay up.

Charley on the MTA :: Our "liberal" senators: Apparently *not* in the pocket of PhRMA (updated)
Tags: , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
To engage in the dialogue here ... (5.33 / 3)
John Kerry and Ted Kennedy have both worked for drug re-importation for a long time. And I know that John Kerry has never taken PhRMA money, so he's not in their pocket by any means. I was assured personally that both of them are totally committed to bringing up the Dorgan amendment to another bill. Where it will pass. This *will* pass the Senate.

In this case, however, the underlying bill wouldn't have passed without the "safety" provision (which we all know kills the re-importation for now). And there's a lot in the underlying bill that's important to get through, and a lot that PhRMA doesn't like about it. It reinstates the fees they pay when they apply for patents. It forces them to be more transparent in their safety and testing regimes. And it creates a situation where pediatric medicines get a higher priority than they do now.

This bill also closes some of the gaps in our food safety testing that has allowed outbreaks of disease in our food recently.

This is not about killing re-importation or being in the pocket of PhRMA (neither of our Senators fits that description). This is about choosing the best avenues to get results. The drug re-importation will pass the Senate. And our Senators will be part of why.

full disclosure: I'm John Kerry's Internet Director


thanks for the response... (0.00 / 0)
I was baffled when I saw that K&K voted for this amendment.  This helps to explain.  My question though is how a stand-alone reimportation bill will pass the Senate if it cannot pass attached to a broader FDA bill?  Are there really senators who are in favor of the reimport bill but opposed to the other positive changes you described in the underlying bill?  It seems to me that is the only way what you're saying is possible when you say it's the only way to get the bill "passed" in the Senate.  Or have the Rs agreed not to filibuster either a standalone reimport bill or the other provisions if you send them through as separate bills?  (If so, I hope they are on the record about this... I would trust them, and their big Pharma friends, about as far as I could throw them... how many times do we have to get burnt here?)  Or is this a WH veto issue---i.e., W will veto anything with a reimport rider and K&K really want the other provisions passed now?

I really hope it's not the latter.  So far as I'm concerned we should pile up the bills on W's desk and let 1000 vetoes bloom.  Attaching popular changes to the reimport bill would seem to put more pressure on him to let the bill go.


[ Parent ]
it's a good question (5.00 / 1)
And there's not a simple answer. Basically, the FDA bill is so huge, with so many provisions that need to pass, and it still has quite a few controversial parts to it. For example, there are some folks who don't like the new testing regime for food. Others don't like the provisions that deal with the transparency and other requirements on drug testing. And on and on ...

And all of these were in jeopardy with the re-importation issue thrown into the mix. The bill does a lot of good stuff, stuff that's been needed for a while, and there's only so much you can do with each bill. Re-importation needs a cleaner bill to attach itself to. In the end, the strategy is not to get just the FDA bill passed, or just the re-importation implemented ... it's to do *both* of those things.

And, yes, there is the Bush veto to consider. Re-importation is very popular in the broad public, and if it's attached to a more stand-alone legislation, with a better build up of activism around it, it's possible to either make the cost of the veto too high, or even gain a veto-proof majority (you think Coleman, Sununu, Collins from border states want to vote with Bush on that one?).

John Kerry and Ted Kennedy are two of the biggest proponents of drug re-importation in the whole Senate. This vote yesterday by the two of them was just about maximizing the chances that it and the FDA bill become a reality.

full disclosure: I'm John Kerry's Internet Director


[ Parent ]



I support WWF


Political insider ad network Law blog ad network
Advertise Liberally









Powered by: SoapBlox