Act Blue!
BMG endorses these candidates for election in 2010! Help them win - fill in a donation amount and click "Contribute" to be directed to BMG's Act Blue page.
Deval Patrick (MA-Gov) $
Mac D'Alessandro (MA-09) $
Jim McGovern (MA-03) $
Jack Conway (KY-Sen) $





Support BMG PAC!
About BMG PAC
Make a secure credit card contribution using Google Checkout:
$
Or send a check to BMG PAC, PO Box 877, Medford, MA 02155.
View BMG PAC's latest disclosure report


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?



FREE COPY OF BOB'S BOOK Barack Obama for Beginners to every 100th Facebook Friend!

BMG on Facebook

About
About us
Rules of the road - please read!
Formatting and multimedia tips
Email us
RSS feed

BMG TRAFFIC REPORT
Blue Mass. Swag
Creative Commons License

Event Calendar
August 2010
(view month)
S M T W R F S
01 02 03 04 05 06 07
08 09 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31 * * * *
<< (add event) >>

Active Users
Currently 3 user(s) logged on.

Search




Advanced Search


Blog Roll
Massachusetts Left
.08 Acres
Below Boston
Berkshires Blog
Blue News Tribune
Chimes at Midnight
Eisenthal Report
Granby 01033
Health Care for All
Left in Lowell
MA lefty blogs
Marry in Mass.
Mass Engagement
Massachusetts Liberal
Michael Forbes-Wilcox
My Dedham
Progressive Mass.
Quriltai on the Shore
Ryan's Take
Someday I Will
ShrewsBuried
Talking Stoneham
The Fray
Universal hub

Differently-Winged
John Daley
Mass. Pro-Life
No Looking Backwards
Peter Porcupine
Pundit Review
Red Mass Group
Scaling the Hill 2010

Mass. Media
David S. Bernstein
Cambridge politics
CommonWealth Unbound
Globe bloggers
Herald bloggers
Hub Blog
Jon Keller
MassBeacon
MA Election 2010
Media Nation (Dan Kennedy)
Open Media Boston
Adam Reilly
Toll Talk (Mary Connaughton)
Weekly Dig Blog
Wicked Local Politics

Legal
ACS Blog
Balkinization
Election law
How Appealing
SCOTUSblog
Volokh Conspiracy

General
Accountable Strategies
Billionaires for Bush
Blue Works Better
Crooks and Liars
Daily Howler
Daily Kos
Democracy Arsenal
Eschaton (Atrios)
Glenn Greenwald
Grist (environment blog)
Hullabaloo (Digby)
LiberalOasis
MyDD
Oliver Willis
Pandagon
Political Animal
Political Critic
Political Wire
Poor Man
Progressive Blog Digest
Real Climate
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Tapped
Talking Points Memo
Think Progress
Truth and Progress
Turn Maine Blue
Wonkette

www.BlueMassGroup.com

"Save Marriage, Save the Planet"

by: Laurel

Thu Dec 06, 2007 at 19:29:28 PM EST


In recent years, growing numbers of evangelicals have decided that part of their mandate from god is to help find solutions to global ecological problems.  I think this is a great development in so many ways.  One is that these folks will need to start working closely with the traditional keepers of environmentalism's keys, lefties.  We can all benefit from working towards a common goal.  

Working towards a common goal, however, may present some unexpected challenges along the way.  For example, take today's blog entry from Gary Randall's Faith & Freedom Fdn (an anti-LGBT christian org).  He gleefully promotes a news story that notes how divorce creates "extra" households (about 2 million of them), and how those households are a further strain on the resources and the environment.  So to improve our environmental lot, get rid of divorce!  This must be an appealing finding to many Christian fundamentalists, because it gives them a non-Biblical reason to oppose divorce that may appeal to secularists.

But have they stopped to think?  There are somewhere between 3 million and 30 million gay or bi people in the country.  According to the 2000 US Census, only 600,000 of us are living together as couples.  Many of us live separately because the inability to legally marry and be out at work makes it difficult, impractical or dangerous to live together.  So like the divorced hetero households, many of us are probably using more energy per person than we would be if we had the same legal protections and institutions open to us that straight people do.  Think of how much energy we could save if we could all marry!

Once they get around to realizing the implications of the "save a marriage, save the planet!" excitement, this will doubtless become a head-scratcher for some environmentally-minded evangelicals.  Is there common ground here?

Cross-posted at PHB.

Laurel :: "Save Marriage, Save the Planet"
Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Reminds me of a July 2006 LA Times op-ed (0.00 / 0)
"If only gay sex caused global warming".

http://www.randomhouse.com/kvp...

Let me get this straight: Democrats protest war, Republicans protest health care?


good point, but not with marriage (0.00 / 1)
So like the divorced hetero households, many of us are probably using more energy per person than we would be if we had the same legal protections and institutions open to us that straight people do.  Think of how much energy we could save if we could all marry!

That's a good point.  But those energy savings would be more than offset by the amount of energy it would take to have genetic offspring together, not even including all the research and technology that goes into developing it.  But maybe the same legal protections and institutions can be made available with Civil Unions, without bringing along the huge carbon footprint and money waste and risk of allowing same sex couples to have children together?


This was ratings abuse, Laurel (0.00 / 0)
See, nothing agsint the rules in there, no personal attacks.

On the other hand, calling someone ignorant and irrelevant is a personal attack, and seems to me to violate the rules.


[ Parent ]





I support WWF

Political insider ad network Law blog ad network
Advertise Liberally









Powered by: SoapBlox